Page 1 of 2
7 of us
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:16 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
from Q3W were owning it up on a server last night. Good times.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:34 pm
by shaft
Fire Team
Homo is unstoppable.

Re: 7 of us
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:02 am
by creep
hmpuffnstuff has forgiven you for teamkilling.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:07 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Last night we ownted pD clan. They were even accusing us of cheating. Haha I like this game.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:08 pm
by obsidian
We need to keep a list of all the clans we owned, like how air-force pilots paint the number of kills on the side of their aircraft.
It's funny when they can't even get out of the spawn area.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:18 am
by dzjepp
Is this game any good? I played it 3 times total. I'll have it soon free with my geforce though.
Kinda looks like yeeanothergenericfpsshooterTM
I think I like TF2 better
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:51 am
by DooMer
played the shit out of the tf2 beta, but find it hard to play since etqw came out. when i'm playing, It feels like i'd rather be playing etqw. It's too slow, and the combat generally isnt as exciting. not to mention the depth, and teamwork involved in etqw is on an entirely different level.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:52 am
by creep
I played a bunch of games tonight just on random servers. Definitely more fun when you have several people working together.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:29 pm
by r0n1n
Good games.
Hopefully I can play some more after exams.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:20 am
by Norlan
How come the gfx in game looks nowhere near as good as the screenshots released to public media?
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:04 am
by creep
Because you don't have a twelve thousand dollar computer.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:58 am
by obsidian
Someone posted comparison screenshots (not on this forum, Doom3World?) and with all the settings turned up, it does in fact look the same between the released screenshots and the game.
Of course the players are actually posing for the screenshot, and that's probably the only thing you won't see.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:17 pm
by Norlan
I wonder how you can make players to make poses...
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:44 pm
by Mogul
........
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:38 pm
by Survivor
what?
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:25 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
who's been playing by the name GONNAKILLYA ?
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:44 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:who's been playing by the name GONNAKILLYA ?
I have no idea. He's from Canada, though.
It's hilarious because the fanboi, never-laid tards over at the ETQW forums were actually JUDGING MY OPINIONS on his/her stats...which was like 17 hours or somat.
lol
Telling someone their opinion doesn't count because of their stats.
Soon I'll be able to join you guys in some proper online games. I've completely abandoned the public-tards online and at the ETQW forum. It's so fucking sad that a wonderful game such as this has to go down in flames due to the 10 year-old retards who play it. This game is going the way of Counter Strike...and fast.
I'm now firmly convinced that online gaming should require an IQ test before being allowed to play. I'm serious. Online gaming has turned to shit the last 2 years due to XP whores and selfish cunts with no sense of team play.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:12 pm
by MKJ
the last two years?
where have you been sir
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:24 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
We should form a loose team and join a league.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:43 pm
by obsidian
I must say, most of us are well above the average ETQW player and are probably on par with some of the top players. I'm good at being the objective whore. If it's hackable, constructable, explodable, I've got it covered!
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:39 pm
by Survivor
I'm generally supporting objective takers or disabling enemy vehicles/deployables.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:56 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
obsidian wrote:I must say, most of us are well above the average ETQW player and are probably on par with some of the top players. I'm good at being the objective whore. If it's hackable, constructable, explodable, I've got it covered!
I agree that we could field a pretty bad-ass team. We've certainly embarrassed a few clans already.
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:35 am
by Canidae
So GKY : What tag have you been playing under then??
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:09 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
GONNAFISTYA
Re: 7 of us
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:02 am
by GONNAFISTYA
My win/loss stats aren't good (and I don't care) because I'll always try to help the losing team if the teams are unbalanced. I don't give a shit about kills/deaths ratios because I'm targeting deployables alot. I'm pretty good at disabling deployables with the flying vehicles (I rarely finish them off because you don't need to), I'm decent at dogfighting, hacking, fixing shit and planting bombs but I remember doing only one successful backstab (I've seen guys utterly own at that). My accuracy is average with the normal weapons and I'm decent at cooking grenades but I'll put you down with the sniper rifle...although the last few times I used it I blew chunks (I was at 80% accuracy for a long time).
Oh yeah....I absolutely suck as a medic/technician and I've also had some pretty embarrassing self-kills.
I think we could probably own many-a-clan out there but I have to say I've played against some really organized clans that steam-rolled our team within 5 minutes. If it's a fair fight, I don't mind losing one bit.
If you need air-cover, hacking, constructing, fixing the MCP or blowing shit up...I'm your man.