Page 1 of 2

Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:05 pm
by DTS
Image

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:09 pm
by seremtan
-_-

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:18 pm
by Turbine
seizure
Image

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:25 pm
by werldhed
Better:
Image

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:39 pm
by Turbine
Japanese TV does that.

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:30 pm
by DTS
This one's 15x15 so it can be used like the smilies without changing the height of the text line.

Image

I made the first one 16x16 cause I was going to resize it but the html wouldn't work for that. (16 is a better number for computers to resize cause it's doubled from 1. I was going to resize it to another doubled number like 512. It should display better doubled.)

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:32 pm
by Captain
I'm sure whatever you just said was highly educational.

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:35 pm
by DTS
Image test test test test test Image
test test test test test
test test test test test
Image test test test test test Image
test test test test test

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:51 pm
by Turbine
Image

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:11 pm
by DTS
These one's are faster, they don't play at the faster speed in IE 6, they look just like the slower ones, but they play fast in Firefox. I don't use Firefox cause it doesn't let you resize the text.

[Edit: I removed the pictures cause they just slow down the browser animations, including the previous ones.]

(In the first ones I posted the frames are 5/100ths of a second, in these they are 2/100ths of a second. I tried 1/100ths but they displayed slow in Firefox (and IE 6).)

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:25 pm
by Captain
Adblock :up:

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:28 pm
by Nightshade
This thread fucking sucks. Mostly because Dultron is a fucking horribly shitty poster.

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:28 pm
by werldhed
DTS wrote:This one's 15x15 so it can be used like the smilies without changing the height of the text line.

Image

I made the first one 16x16 cause I was going to resize it but the html wouldn't work for that. (16 is a better number for computers to resize cause it's doubled from 1. I was going to resize it to another doubled number like 512. It should display better doubled.)
You must be very proud.

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:30 pm
by werldhed
DTS wrote:I don't use Firefox cause it doesn't let you resize the text.
:dork:

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:46 pm
by seremtan
DTS wrote:These one's are faster, they don't play at the faster speed in IE 6, they look just like the slower ones, but they play fast in Firefox. I don't use Firefox cause it doesn't let you resize the text.

[Edit: I removed the pictures cause they just slow down the browser animations, including the previous ones.]

(In the first ones I posted the frames are 5/100ths of a second, in these they are 2/100ths of a second. I tried 1/100ths but they displayed slow in Firefox (and IE 6).)
Image

Re: Test

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:14 pm
by DRuM
seremtan wrote:
Image
:olo:

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:14 pm
by DTS
Alright, I'll post the faster ones to prove it to you.

16x16: Image
15x15: Image

Edit: Strange, it didn't slow down the animations this time. It must have been another page I had open slowing things down before.

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:30 pm
by DTS
This one doesn't display fast in Firefox for some reason (it's 2/100ths of a second per frame). The smaller ones do. It must be the size. (Maybe it will slow down the other animations? Let me see...)

Image

Edit: Yeah, it does. If it's scrolled off screen then the other animations play at the proper speed.
Edit2: And if just the top of it is shown then it plays fast, but it doesn't seem quite as fast as the others.
(This is all in Firefox, IE 6 won't play the 2/100ths per frame speed ones at the right speed anyway.)

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:40 pm
by DTS
werldhed wrote:
DTS wrote:I don't use Firefox cause it doesn't let you resize the text.
:dork:
I've found the option for that now, I was expecting there to be a button for it, like in IE, but there isn't.

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:56 pm
by DTS
Image

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
by Turbine
This thread makes me want to puke, watching all these flashy things.
Very disorienting and nausea inducing.

:puke: :puke:

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
by Doombrain
Image

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:07 pm
by Turbine
Here is something more pleasing to look at.

Image

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:11 pm
by werldhed
DTS wrote: I've found the option for that now, I was expecting there to be a button for it, like in IE, but there isn't.
ctrl +
:shrug:

Re: Test

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:18 pm
by DTS
werldhed wrote:
DTS wrote: I've found the option for that now, I was expecting there to be a button for it, like in IE, but there isn't.
ctrl +
:shrug:
Thanks.

Edit: I thought you meant ctrl + something, so I tried ctrl and the mousewheel, which works (then I posted the message). Then later I found that in the menu it says ctrl + + and stuff.