Quake3World

official cause of collapse of wtc 1, 2 and 7 has always been fire...

so why the fuck did this building in madrid which is made junk parts, not collapse in on its own footprint like wtc buildings? maybe because its impossible without explosives...which this fired just proved...

of course

thx...

Freakaloin wrote:official cause of collapse of wtc 1, 2 and 7 has always been fire...

so why the fuck did this building in madrid which is made junk parts, not collapse in on its own footprint like wtc buildings? maybe because its impossible without explosives...which this fired just proved...

"Prove" is a pretty strong word.

god thats old, get with the times ffs

and it was the jews

SoM wrote:god thats old, get with the times ffs

and it was the jews

HAHA! A mossad 'expert' everyone! Check it out.

terrorist

to be fair the buildings causing as little damage as they did for the size of themis quite strange. I mean you lok at the way the buliding fell in on itself. Why didnt the wind blow the building left or right?

Its very stange considering...

nice fire

Jesus, when is this stupidity going to end?

edit: WHEN WILL THE TYPOS END?

wtc 1 2 and 7 were demoed...anyone who isn't a moron knows it...

who gives a shit?

ur dad took a shit when i was fucking him...silly fagot...

lol...this fire was 1000 times worse then the fires at wtc buildings...at itr didn't fal...and it wasn't even made of steel...rofl...

did it have a jumbo jet and a hole in the side of the buidling ?

losCHUNK wrote:did it have a jumbo jet and a hole in the side of the buidling ?

Owned...

Surley though, having a jumbo jet crash into the side would have weakened the structure of the building...

what i was thinking, qa hole in the side of the building caused by a jumbo jet and its fuel

and if you looked the way it collapsed the top fell above the hole, so what couldve happened is that the plane took out supports holding the floors above up then the fire destroyed the remaining supports

then the entire top half collapsed onto the bottom causing it to fall like a stack of cards....

if you wanna believe its a hoax then fair enough but that dont prove shit

wtc 7 wasn't hit by a jet...only a few floors burned...

if u know anything about wtc 1 and 2 construction, u would know the planes could never cause those buildings to be weakened enuff to fall. the exoskeleton was string and was damaged by the planes, but the core of the buildings were intact...and all 3 of the wtc building were made above any standards...and they were STEEL...not concrete...

and by the way dumbo...no one thinks the planes smashing into the buildings had anything to do with the collapse...they buildings were designed to withstand planes crashing into them. the buildings swayed more during storms then they did when they were it by the planes...the fires are the offical reason for the collapse...even though no steel framed skyscaper has collpased from fired until 911...when 3 did...all 3 with minor fires that didn't even get hot enough to melt steel...

don't be a moron...

o fuck off the fact is you dont know how much damage was caused when the plane hit

wanna know why, because it all ended up as rubble

wow...it amazing how brainwashed u morons are...do u even know how wtc 1 and 2 were constructed? guess not...and what about wtc7? it was hardly damaged...anyways the owner of the building slipped in an interview and admitted(on camera) the building was "pulled"...

clit

also the core wass intact ?

in one of the vids you can see flames sprout out the other side of the building when the plane hit, how the fuck can it be intact if that happens

wanna know why, because it all ended up as rubble

yeah and the rubble was taken and destroyed as fast as possible in sigapore...which is a crime in itself...

cuz the core is in the middle...where the planes never hit...dumbass..

Freakaloin wrote:wow...it amazing how brainwashed u morons are...do u even know how wtc 1 and 2 were constructed? guess not...and what about wtc7? it was hardly damaged...anyways the owner of the building slipped in an interview and admitted(on camera) the building was "pulled"...

how ?

well im guessing they started from the bottom and worked theyre way up

A small plane flying into the tower, yeah, wouldnt do much damage...

But a jumbo fully laden with fuel flown DIRECTLY at the tower, then thats a different story...


EDIT: Damnit, stop posting so quickly, keep missing things out :icon32: