Page 1 of 5
Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:46 am
by LawL
Neither have anything to do with the forums (besides raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned) and both have freely admitted they are over it.
Should they be replaced by someone like Dark Metal (Dick Measle) who actually does something around here?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:47 am
by +JuggerNaut+
Who?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:16 am
by GONNAFISTYA
I thought those two had long fucked off and the barn was run by DM and DooMer?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:02 am
by LawL
raw, Dave and Doomer are the admins. Dark Metal is a Global Moderator.
You are entirely correct though in terms of those who actually run the forum.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:36 am
by MKJ
i was gonna post something like "another lawl thread crying about the mods", but this seems like a reasonable discussion.

Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:44 am
by LawL
Yeah well I think most already know my stance on the subject, and it's not like anything is going to come of it regardless of the poll results. I'm just interested to see what others think, especially considering polls are anonymous.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:01 am
by bork[e]
LawL wrote:(besides raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned)

Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:19 pm
by Nightshade
raw actually does still play an active role, from what I'm told. Daev, however, must have imploded or died of skinny.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:52 pm
by seremtan
LawL wrote:raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned
everyone he banned in December '99
December '99
why don't you remind us all of who raw banned 7 years before you registered? it would really be helpful
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:00 pm
by LawL
Nightshade wrote:raw actually does still play an active role, from what I'm told. Daev, however, must have imploded or died of skinny.
Unfortunately that role consists purely of throwing tantrums when someone he has an eternal e-grudge against has been unbanned.
seremtan wrote:why don't you remind us all of who raw banned 7 years before you registered? it would really be helpful
Why don't you remind us of what life was like during the English Revolution, it would be very insightful.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:04 pm
by seremtan
why don't you dodge a straightforward question on account of being a faggot? it would be really... predictable
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:15 pm
by Nightshade
I guess garyglittertan forgot who BadMutha was.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:16 pm
by Doombrain
i doubt lawl or testo will remember him.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:49 pm
by LawL
seremtan wrote:why don't you dodge a straightforward question on account of being a faggot? it would be really... predictable
No one was banned in the first month the forum was opened that I know of dumbo, I was exaggerating to make a point. You gonna be ok now?
Doombrain wrote:i doubt lawl or testo will remember him.
I love the way I have you so confused and running in circles. Usernames: serious business.

Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:50 pm
by Doombrain
really

Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:50 pm
by LawL
OWNED.

Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:37 pm
by seremtan
Nightshade wrote:I guess garyglittertan forgot who BadMutha was.
a fat greek monobrowed retard who went to jail for receiving weed through the post?
also, if you think Testo and LawL are the same person, how come you've happily weaved yourself a hammock out of LawL's ass hairs, but not Testo's?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:38 pm
by seremtan
LawL wrote:seremtan wrote:why don't you dodge a straightforward question on account of being a faggot? it would be really... predictable
No one was banned in the first month the forum was opened that I know of dumbo, I was exaggerating to make a point. You gonna be ok now?


Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:47 pm
by LawL
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:08 am
by Nightshade
seremtan wrote:Nightshade wrote:I guess garyglittertan forgot who BadMutha was.
a fat greek monobrowed retard who went to jail for receiving weed through the post?
also, if you think Testo and LawL are the same person, how come you've happily weaved yourself a hammock out of LawL's ass hairs, but not Testo's?

You're beyond ignorant.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:35 am
by DRuM
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:24 am
by MKJ
well this turned sour quick.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:48 pm
by shaft
LawL wrote:Neither have anything to do with the forums (besides raw who pops in once every 12 months to make sure everyone he banned in December '99 is still banned) and both have freely admitted they are over it.
Should they be replaced by someone like Dark Metal (Dick Measle) who actually does something around here?
who cares?
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:16 pm
by Fender
^ I believe that's the purpose of this thread, finding out who cares.
Re: Should raw and Dave remain as admins?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:58 pm
by seremtan
probably no one except the OP