[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on value of type null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on value of type null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on value of type null
Quake3World • GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0
Page 1 of 2

GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:06 pm
by Dessicated corpse
Which one is better and why? I think GTKRadiant 1.4.0 is better! It has more features included in it!

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:41 pm
by cityy
Both have it's advantages. 1.4 has always been more stable but 1.5 has the better texture browser and feels smother to me. Then again the way 1.5 handles vertex points is stupid.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:44 pm
by monaster
There's been a similar discussion going on a few months ago when Aeon came back for some time (where're you now? :cry: ), it's to be found here. Otherwise the changelog might help.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:52 pm
by Anthem
I use 1.4 for the majority of my mapping and 1.5 for finishing touches (textures and stuff).

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:26 pm
by ^misantropia^
1.4? 1.5? 1.6 is where it's at!

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:57 pm
by cityy
@monaster: Last time I've spoken to AEon he was playing some MMO on his new PC.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:02 am
by Delirium
1.4 is so much easier, I don't like the brush selection in the 3d view of 1.5 and the texture selection view :>

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:43 am
by obsidian
I use 1.5 almost exclusively these days. Sometimes I'll play around with 1.6 or NetRadiant. I don't use 1.4 at all.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:13 pm
by monaster
@cityy: Well, let's hope he returns safe and sound, there're still some projects left. ;)

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:43 am
by Dessicated corpse
^misantropia^ wrote:1.4? 1.5? 1.6 is where it's at!
ZeroRadiant 1.6 is only a test build.
cityy wrote:@monaster: Last time I've spoken to AEon he was playing some MMO on his new PC.
It's called WoW, now he's addicted :(.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:51 am
by dONKEY
1.5 these days...much easier for handling models. Texturing in 1.5 is crap compared to 1.4.....but it depends how you work.
The main advantage in 1.5 as far as I can see is stopping newbs creating bad brushes by dragging verts about trying to create terrain and stuffs.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:03 am
by dichtfux
Seriously? I hate it if people remove powerful tools and claim they did it for your own good. :puke:

Oh no, people could create a bad brush with this, help! :cry:

A bad brush. So what?!

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:22 pm
by ShadoW_86
I think two last post sums this whole debate :).

About me? 1.4 Forever :).

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:30 am
by dONKEY
1.4 for texturing, 1.5 for models. I have been using both in sync for ages. A better question might have been which apps do you use to create a map....for me it's:
GTK 1.4
GTK 1.5
Gimp
Blender
q3map2
bspc
winzip

//edit forgot...editpad and hexedit

I recently dumped using frontend apps for the compilers in favour of batchfiles, which I can work must faster with.

and then hardware apart from my laptop....

My camera

These days gimp and blender are the apps I spend most time with.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:42 am
by ShadoW_86
dONKEY wrote: These days gimp and blender are the apps I spend most time with.
I'm starting to feel that I'm the only one around her who can't use blender at proper level yet :shrug: :tear: . I really have to change it :).

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:42 pm
by g0th-
I really have to agree with donkey, the only reason im using 1.5 is for models and I really miss the Z window in 1.4 (and yes i know you can switch view or have multiple view but i always manage to drag the mouse to the side so the brushes moves with it in the xz, yz views.)

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:15 pm
by fKd
1.5 for me, after 202 stopped working i just switched to 1.5 its all good...

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:15 pm
by $NulL
Just throwing in an honorable mention for Q3Radiant, I've just never found better. Sure 1.4 has paint select which is awesome, and 1.5 has that rotation gizmo which is super awesome for placing models. But for pure brush/texture work I don't think its beatable.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:47 pm
by g0th-
yeah should mention that the damn save function don't work in vista as well for 1.4 but the autosave does

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:52 pm
by Kaz
After I was essentially forced to start using 1.5.0 after swapping to Win7, I've gotten used to it and don't bother with 1.4.0 anymore.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:15 pm
by o'dium
Can't say I've ever been a fan of GTK, its UI is just backwards... Classic Linux.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:53 pm
by cityy
ShadoW_86 wrote:
dONKEY wrote: These days gimp and blender are the apps I spend most time with.
I'm starting to feel that I'm the only one around her who can't use blender at proper level yet :shrug: :tear: . I really have to change it :).
Same here. :toothy:

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:34 am
by ^misantropia^
o'dium wrote:Can't say I've ever been a fan of GTK, its UI is just backwards... Classic Linux.
So much misinformedness in a single line. Impressive.

GtkRadiant is hardly the poster child for the GTK UI framework as a whole.

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 3:50 am
by obsidian
I'm sure if you grew up using Linux and GTK, you'd look at a Windows application running in WINE and say...





Image

Re: GTKRadiant 1.4.0 vs GTKRadiant 1.5.0

Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:28 am
by monaster
cityy wrote:
ShadoW_86 wrote:quote
These days gimp and blender are the apps I spend most time with.quote

I'm starting to feel that I'm the only one around her who can't use blender at proper level yet :shrug: :tear: . I really have to change it :).
Same here. :toothy:
Counter raised to three (as a future project).


@dichtfux:
Seriously? I hate it if people remove powerful tools and claim they did it for your own good. :puke:
Oh no, people could create a bad brush with this, help! :cry:
A bad brush. So what?!
Amen! Still using 1.2.1 for nearly everything (especially brush and texture work, that's my personal Q3Radiant) and 1.5.0 only for some special compiling options and something so unimportant that I even can't remember it right now. And before ppl start praising 1.5.0 for its easy use with multiple selection of single brush sides: that has already been possible in 1.2.1! Just use CTRL+SHIFT+ALT+LMB :toothy: z-window for president!