Page 1 of 1
Reality engine.. check it out.
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 9:58 pm
by reefsurfer
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:00 pm
by saturn
Doesn't look that awesome at all. Bleh, more of those uninteresting fps engine shite.
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:03 pm
by reefsurfer
saturn wrote:Doesn't look that awesome at all. Bleh, more of those uninteresting fps engine shite.
Dont click my thread then cunt.. let people that might be intrested discuss it instead.. no one is intrested in how much yer yawning.
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:06 pm
by saturn
It's my opinion dipshit.
Go buy that bowling thing now :icon10:
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:07 pm
by 4days
stop being a knob, reef.
it does look bloody good - be nice to get hold of that tech-demo.
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:08 pm
by FlamingTP
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:09 pm
by reefsurfer
saturn wrote:
Go buy that bowling thing now :icon10:
Im working on it damn it :icon33:
There's budgets, plans, inventory, deals, rent negotiations and 20 applications that needs to be filled...
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:10 pm
by saturn
hah, that will keep your mind off these engines
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:18 pm
by Don Carlos
I notice its a DX9 engine.
So why compare it to Doom 3 which is a GL Engine?
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:20 pm
by bitWISE
Looks pretty sweet. Wonder how well it lends itself to game design...
Microsoft's .NET 2.0 platform has allowed us to unlock the potential of our powerful and flexible level editing tools as well as our flexible programming framework.
This isn't exactly a feature I would be pimping since 2.0 isn't out of beta yet....
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:38 pm
by Cool Blue
.Net kicks ass.
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 11:06 pm
by inolen
FlamingTP wrote:http://quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4666
ownt
Please tell how the Unreal3 engine, with its full features unbeknownst to us, is better than this one?
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 11:11 pm
by phantasmagoria
i think it looks good
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 12:22 am
by bitWISE
Cool Blue wrote:.Net kicks ass.
I agree but I wouldn't build a commercial product that had to be used with a beta framework/driver/etc...
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 2:16 am
by -SKID-
Metronome
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/740/740307/imgs_1.html
I think it looks like a cool game. Different to say the least.
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 4:13 am
by U4EA
bitWISE wrote:I agree but I wouldn't build a commercial product that had to be used with a beta framework/driver/etc...
If the release time of the product is after the framework's release, I'd say it's an excellent way to get a massive headstart. Also, being beta they will probably be working closer with Microsoft than they would otherwise and will have the ability to bring to light any issues they uncover. Not to mention that Microsoft has probably waited until it was quite stable before opening it to MSDN subscribers so the bulk of the changes before release will likely be only bug fixes.
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 7:46 am
by Eraser
to be honest, most of those screenshots don't look much better (and remind me of) Silent Hill 2
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 7:57 am
by MKJ
Eraser wrote:to be honest, most of those screenshots don't look much better (and remind me of) Silent Hill 2
higher texture res, fo sho
but i must say, it looks a bit splintercellish.
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 7:57 am
by Oldfriend
this would have a more dramatic effect if they trashed all the images but the last one, it definately has potential
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 8:01 am
by Deji
I have an even better reality engine. Go to your front door and open it. Feast your eyes on that real-time per pixel lightning!
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 8:25 am
by SplishSplash
How is this better than the Far Cry engine?
Seriously. Maybe they've used a couple more polys and higher res textures, but that's not really that impressive considering the continuing advance in hardware.
At least Doom3 had those shadow thingies.
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 8:31 am
by Geebs
Reefsurfer, why not post just one pic and give a link rather than sticking in 3000 like you usually do? Give me and Booger a break.
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 9:49 am
by reefsurfer
Geebs wrote:Reefsurfer, why not post just one pic and give a link rather than sticking in 3000 like you usually do? Give me and Booger a break.
Im sorry man, but you two arent exactly the majority on these boards....
but i will have it in mind next time im posting lvlshots. :icon31:
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 4:57 pm
by bitWISE
U4EA wrote:bitWISE wrote:I agree but I wouldn't build a commercial product that had to be used with a beta framework/driver/etc...
If the release time of the product is after the framework's release, I'd say it's an excellent way to get a massive headstart. Also, being beta they will probably be working closer with Microsoft than they would otherwise and will have the ability to bring to light any issues they uncover. Not to mention that Microsoft has probably waited until it was quite stable before opening it to MSDN subscribers so the bulk of the changes before release will likely be only bug fixes.
The beta sdk and runtime have been public for a while. So you don't really have to be close to Microsoft to use it. I've been building stuff in C# with it and although I don't see anything wrong with it I just felt like finding something negative to argue about.
