Quake3World

http://youtu.be/pxOSPfUw3qw

lol, Hollywood?

Ya know, if they would've took Mary Shelley's original story, it could've been a really amazing film. I don't think they've done a proper Frankenstein film since the 30s...

that looks absolutely shit

xer0s wrote:Ya know, if they would've took Mary Shelley's original story, it could've been a really amazing film. I don't think they've done a proper Frankenstein film since the 30s...

Young Frankenstein.

Also you've never read the original story, dumbass.

Ah, Young Frankenstein, one of my favourite movies.
Gotta love their take on "Putting on the Ritz".

On topic, wow, that trailer really does look shit.

the first movie i ever viewed in a theater was a double feature«!

young Frankenstein and silent movie!

Yeah, Young Frankenstein is one of my favorite Brooks films. But I was referring to a traditional Horror/Drama film portraying the original story...

That looks like a new level of awful

xer0s wrote:portraying the original story...

Which you haven't read.

xer0s wrote: I don't think they've done a proper Frankenstein film since the 30s...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankenste ... 94_film%29

it's a strange movie. 7/10

very close to the book. and not a typical hollywood movie with the usual three acts.

i like it but is has some weaknesses.

some quirky directing. especially the fight with the wolves in the first 7 minutes.

good actors: kenneth branagh, robert de niro, tom hulce, helena bonham carter ~ and john cleese in a non comical role.

it's slightly overacted in parts but that seems to be a design decision and i quite liked it - it's not cheesy overacting; more dramatic overacting. it feels a bit like watching a theater piece in the spirit of berolt brecht.

Eraser wrote:that looks absolutely shit

nah... THIS looks like absolutely shit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBq1AupSrLI

While Speaking About Other Shitty Movies Most Of You Douchebags wrote:I'll wait until I've seen it before judging it.

lol?

Yeah...lol

Pext wrote:

Eraser wrote:that looks absolutely shit

nah... THIS looks like absolutely shit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBq1AupSrLI

No no...THIS is shit.

Captain Mazda wrote:
No no...THIS is shit.

http://www.youtube.com/v/x4ukwHdACDw

Looks like a trailer for an 80's action flick, namsayn?

Pext wrote:

Eraser wrote:that looks absolutely shit

nah... THIS looks like absolutely shit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBq1AupSrLI

Looks like they listed movies about ancient Greece and just ticked all the cliché boxes they wanted in there.

xer0s wrote:http://youtu.be/pxOSPfUw3qw

THIS ENDS TONIGHT

if only it would

Captain Mazda wrote:No no...THIS is shit.

http://www.youtube.com/v/x4ukwHdACDw

i think you'll find that THIS is shitter...

Eraser wrote:

Captain Mazda wrote:
No no...THIS is shit.

http://www.youtube.com/v/x4ukwHdACDw

Looks like a trailer for an 80's action flick, namsayn?

Except the 80s action flick it's based on was actually a great movie and this garbage shits all over its legacy, then eats the shit and pukes it out on top of the leftover shit.

seremtan wrote:i think you'll find that THIS is shitter...

Oh god, I can't decide which one's more laughable: 47 Ronin or this wankfest.

Keanu Reeves hasn't made a watchable movie since Constantine

lol all of this reminds me of a seasonal phenomenon known as "Fuck you. It's January" ©RedLetterMedia
It spells out how all the movies released in and around that time of year suck fat cock.

seremtan wrote:Keanu Reeves hasn't made a watchable movie since Constantine

Constantine was not watchable in the slightest

Are we trying to suggest here that Keanu Reeves' performance in The Matrix was a shining beacon of acting proficiency?

The Matrix was watchable despite Reeves' presence.

Eraser wrote:The Matrix was watchable

Watchable is a huge understatement. This was the top action movie of the decade.

The first was awesome, but after that, it went downhill quickly to be honest

While that is true, they did push some serious boundaries