Quake3World

short article here: http://io9.com/what-will-nasa-be-doing- ... 1468333514

@4:50 shes like "we don't know what the best questions are to ask"

everyone knows the question..

thx for the linkage

An interesting article so thanks

why I'm waiting to get a new PC

so its fastÉ

couple of apple software updates ought to fix that !

the thing to take awat from quantum computing , is that it is a very specialized tool. Even with cost not being an issue, it will prolly never replace desktop every day computing... they are extremely good with large number calculations, that's where they shine. Running quake3 on the other hand, not so much.

but it should compile a map in seconds, amirite

It'll compile a near infinite number of possible map layouts and hand you the best of the bunch in seconds.

This is why i'm waiti... oh, that's already been done.

Tsakali wrote:the thing to take awat from quantum computing , is that it is a very specialized tool. Even with cost not being an issue, it will prolly never replace desktop every day computing... they are extremely good with large number calculations, that's where they shine. Running quake3 on the other hand, not so much.

Quake 3 bot AI, so much.

obsidian wrote:It'll compile a near infinite number of possible map layouts and hand you the best of the bunch in seconds.

You would first have to define what consitutes 'best'

Tsakali wrote:the thing to take awat from quantum computing , is that it is a very specialized tool. Even with cost not being an issue, it will prolly never replace desktop every day computing.

I don't know - with large and super efficient quantum computing centers distributed around the globe there could be a shift towards personal cloud computing where you use cheap devices locally and offshore your intense calculations. In the far future!

But then again; no normal person is actually smart enough to require intense calculations.

Tsakali wrote:

obsidian wrote:It'll compile a near infinite number of possible map layouts and hand you the best of the bunch in seconds.

You would first have to define what consitutes 'best'

That's an interesting thought: With near unlimited calculations it would be possible to tackle for example hard mathematical problems using formalised mathematics and a brute force attack to distill proofs. This would shift the practice of mathematicians in a major way.

Same goes for programming itself. Once you specify what you want you could brute force through a wide array of programs and see if they match the specification.

So this would cause a shift from "how?" to "what?" and ultimately to "why?".

Pext wrote:
I don't know - with large and super efficient quantum computing centers distributed around the globe there could be a shift towards personal cloud computing where you use cheap devices locally and offshore your intense calculations. In the far future!

But then again; no normal person is actually smart enough to require intense calculations.

yeah, that would be one way to bring that power home.. matter of fact the link mentions something along those lines

Pext wrote: So this would cause a shift from "how?" to "what?" and ultimately to "why?".

poetic