Page 1 of 15
President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:17 pm
by coltonquake3
The title says it all.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:52 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:11 pm
by xer0s
We could fill this thread up with as much bullshit as the Trump thread...
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:25 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
She'll be great for the uber-rich who now own almost everything, great for the banks, great for the weapons manufacturers, great for the jails for profit people, just to name a few of her constituents.
An utterly slimy human being .
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:58 pm
by Captain
She'll be great for the corporations, banks, military-industrial complex, Saudi and Israeli terrorists, the invasion of sovereign countries, unethical subsidies and lobbyists, human rights violators, and the destruction of the environment.
All in all, she'll be great for the status quo.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:54 pm
by CZghost
Monica Lewins likes this

Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 5:17 pm
by Eraser
Captain Mazda wrote:She'll be great for the corporations, banks, military-industrial complex, Saudi and Israeli terrorists, the invasion of sovereign countries, unethical subsidies and lobbyists, human rights violators, and the destruction of the environment.
All in all, she'll be great for the status quo.
This is the kind of argumentation I see a lot, where Hillary is said to be a continuation of current politics. Then, more often than not, people follow up by saying how the US is fucked because it's going to be a choice between two evils (often implying one isn't necessarily much worse than the other).
Now, if a vote for Hillary is a vote for the status quo (nothing changes compared to how things are now) then are these people saying that things are really that bad right now? Especially compared to the shit that Trump will likely bring to the table?
In other words, with Hillary Clinton things will more or less stay the same but we're all pretty much in agreement that with Trump things will get much worse. The choice shouldn't be that hard then, right?
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 5:30 pm
by Captain
Think of the policies that have been brought forward during Obama's time (TPP for example) and the proxy wars and acts of terrorism his government has initiated. Then remember that Hilary was one of the leading war drummers of his staff and it's not hard to imagine how much worse things will get with her in power, especially with how much more she fellates Netanyahu and his AIPAC cronies compared to Obomba.
I think "the lesser of two evils" approach is what morons say to comfort themselves knowing they're part of a broken system that needs to be torn down but are unwilling to do anything about it.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:09 pm
by seremtan
assuming you actually mean Monica Lewinsky, i doubt that, since Shillary connived in her husband's attempts to smear her once he'd had his way with her like the shitcunt he is
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:13 pm
by xer0s
Honestly, what do you think that marriage and relationship is like? There's no way they're on good terms. How could they possibly have a healthy kinship? I bet their alone time with each other is unbearable...
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:11 pm
by shaft
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:15 pm
by Captain
Anyone know wtf seremtan is babbling about?
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:49 pm
by seremtan
yes, just not you

Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:08 pm
by Transient
shaft wrote:[img]
Pretty much exactly what I was thinking.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:27 pm
by Synergy
Is the world ready for the most powerful leader to be a woman? HILL' NO!
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 1:48 am
by lars63
Personally I would rather have Clinton than Trump any day
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:02 am
by losCHUNK
Synergy wrote:Is the world ready for the most powerful leader to be a woman? HILL' NO!
[lvlshot]http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/3980674-3x4-700x933.jpg[/lvlshot]
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 7:05 am
by Mat Linnett
Well, Ronny was probably still more powerful than Thatcher, but then we do still have precedent:

Re: President Clinton
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 5:53 pm
by coltonquake3
What DOESN'T make sense is that there's enough evidence (& bad crimes (at least apparently)) in her emails to jail her for life.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:45 am
by coltonquake3
At least Clinton's being seen better than Trump for the bad things he's done, anyway...
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:22 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:35 pm
by Captain
Warmongering piece of shit
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:50 pm
by seremtan
coltonquake3 wrote:At least Clinton's being seen better than Trump for the bad things he's done, anyway...
thing is, Trump hasn't really done anything bad on the scale of Clinton. he's a dodgy blowhard who says racist things; she's a slimy maniac who loves bombing and has blood on her hands
which isn't to say Trump wouldn't be a massive cunt if he had his hands on the levers of power. just that Clinton's already been there, done that
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:18 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:04 am
by Ryoki
I agree with all that Hilly stuff, it's true - she's mostly a terrible person.
Trump though... he's worse. So much worse.