Page 1 of 1

Digital Camer suggestions from all you shutterbugs

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:28 pm
by capriker
I want to purchase a new digital camera and am looking for suggestions. From what I know (which isn't much):
  • More megapixals are somewhat better but not the end all be all.
    The CCD in the camera and the lense are more important.
    Optical Zoom is better than digital zoom.
The thing is, I like to experiment with different light and exposure settings but those features, along with a better optical zoom, usually only come on the larger cameras. I really like the uber small cameras though...

Any suggestions, things to look out for, be aware of? I was thinking Nikon or along those lines, oh,and using SD card is almost a must.

Thanks.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:34 pm
by Doombrain
canon d350

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:36 pm
by SoM
my uncle bought this http://www.nikon.ca/products/d2x/ a few days ago, its fucking sweet but didnt have long to play with it as he has left for Europe

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:57 pm
by capriker

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:58 pm
by capriker
And btw, I'm looking at $500-$650 US most.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 9:54 pm
by Guest
Canon Powershot Pro1.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:13 pm
by phantasmagoria
fuji s7000

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:23 pm
by Guest
Canon > *

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:49 pm
by rep
People who put a budget on their camera purchase don't know what they're doing.

You can get a Canon Digital Rebel XT for a few hundred more, and you'll use it for a very long time.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:50 pm
by mxrz
Panasonic FZ5, the best in the superzoom class.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfz5/

fast aperture throughout the entire 12X zoom range
Leica glass, optical stabilization...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:56 pm
by mxrz
rep wrote:You can get a Canon Digital Rebel XT for a few hundred more, and you'll use it for a very long time.
You'd have to spend a shitload to match FZ5's optically stabilized 36-432mm f/3.3 maximum aperture lens, in function that is, I'm not talking about quality. Some people prefer convenience over maximum control, not to mention small size and low weight. A DSLR is not for everyone.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 11:12 pm
by inphlict
I don't know much about digital camera's but stay away from Kodak they break easy from my experience.

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:34 am
by Postal
Kinda off-topic, but if anyone could tell me how to get the ISO speed to 800 on a Promaster 2500PK, that'd be great. (The iso select ring has nothing between 400 and 1000),

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:55 am
by SoM
ToxicBug wrote:Canon > *
wrong

nikon

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:56 am
by SoM
Postal wrote:Kinda off-topic, but if anyone could tell me how to get the ISO speed to 800 on a Promaster 2500PK, that'd be great. (The iso select ring has nothing between 400 and 1000),
set it to 1000 ?

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:04 am
by Postal
You can do that?

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:07 am
by andyman
Postal wrote:You can do that?
I don't see why not..

edit: i dont think it will blow up the camera

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:42 am
by Postal
well i mean with 800 speed film, wouldn't it make it too grainy or whatnot?

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:48 am
by Guest
SoM wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:Canon > *
wrong

nikon
FUCK

YOU

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 8:10 am
by mjrpes
mxrz wrote:Panasonic FZ5, the best in the superzoom class.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfz5/

fast aperture throughout the entire 12X zoom range
Leica glass, optical stabilization...
I'll put another vote in for this one.

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 9:34 am
by rep
I don't trust ANYTHING Panasonic. Have you ever used their batteries?

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 11:09 am
by mjrpes
rep wrote:I don't trust ANYTHING Panasonic. Have you ever used their batteries?
Have you researched this camera?

Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 3:29 pm
by capriker
rep wrote:People who put a budget on their camera purchase don't know what they're doing.

You can get a Canon Digital Rebel XT for a few hundred more, and you'll use it for a very long time.
By that logic I'll just keep upping the budget until I'm spending $23,000.

I don't want an SLR, this is more for fun than anything else. I wouldn't use it enough to make it worth spending a lot of money.

That being said, I won't skimp on a few dollars more if I can get significant benefit within my stated requirements.