Quake3World

"There are a number of critics who would object to this bill-signing if it were in a public school, a library, a Wal-Mart parking lot or any other venue, because they oppose pro-life and pro-family issues."

That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Isn't that post hoc logic?

I don't think it's any kind of logic.

logic ? he round here now n agin

there is no such thing as separation of church and state

You're right, there isn't. It IS, however, a simplified term for something that really does exist. And that something is wording in the constitution that is meant to keep religion from influencing government policy.

R00k wrote:You're right, there isn't. It IS, however, a simplified term for something that really does exist. And that something is wording in the constitution that is meant to keep religion from influencing government policy.

Perhaps people have forgotten why our ancestors came here in the first place.

bitWISE wrote:

R00k wrote:You're right, there isn't. It IS, however, a simplified term for something that really does exist. And that something is wording in the constitution that is meant to keep religion from influencing government policy.

Perhaps people have forgotten why our ancestors came here in the first place.

Because they were overly-religous prudes who killed others regularly for not believing the way they did and/or breaking some religious code, and the Brits didn't want them there raining on their figurative parade?

Are you serious smith? :lol:

Edit: Maybe you're confusing our founding fathers with the Puritans who came over.

bitWISE wrote: Perhaps people have forgotten why our ancestors came here in the first place.

To kill indians, own black people and marry their cousins?

The public reason GKY. The public reason.