Quake3World

I figured since you never respond to posts within threads, you might respond to a thread with your name in the title:

so:

there are at least three areas where I'm still awaiting a response from you:

1) stuff about your quote that claimed the existence of clinical studies that showed that meat causes cancer

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewto ... ans#128954

2) stuff about the speed reading

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewto ... eck#127930

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewto ... ion#127951

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewto ... ion#128938

3) stuff about modulating pitch and the bush mp3

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewto ... ant#125087

I'm taking your silence on these posts as equivalent to you saying:

"Yes you make good points. I see what you mean and i can't argue with them. Therefore I'm going to remain silent"

your mastery of the force is evident; follow the path.

Jules FTW!

FTW - Forschungszentrum Telekommunikation Wien btw.

The joint research center of leading players in telecom business and science in Austria.

bitWISE wrote:Jules FTW!

Juliownt :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19:

when rep gets seriously owned he just pretends the thread never existed

MKJ wrote:when rep gets seriously owned he just pretends the thread never existed

I hereby declare we pull a collective Tove on rep and troll him with a link to this thread everytime he posts

LOL

wp julios

Hey, rep while you're at it, why not posting some of your awesome photoshop/illustrator/3DS Max work too? High-res plz.

[xeno]Julios wrote:"Yes you make good points. I see what you mean and i can't argue with them. Therefore I'm going to remain silent"

Or maybe your words don't hold much of interest to me to warrant my reading of everything you say? The King can only hold so many jesters in one court.

I'll make your day and address some of what is sure to be trash.

[xeno]Julios wrote:My main point is that if the artist were to tweak the original pitch intonations, which bush's mind generated, then we'd lose that information.

Probably not. As long as the formant remained in tact, it would sound like he was actually singing it. It wouldn't chipmunk or sound unnatural.

[xeno]Julios wrote:Therefore, speaking is a kind of singing

Not at all.

[xeno]Julios wrote:so i tried the demo - went from 403 to 477, but i didn't get the full meaning of either passages, since i was reading so fast.

That's not a great gain. Most people almost double their reading speed with the first few sessions. I'm not to the 1200 words per minute level, but when I am I surmise that I would in fact be missing some of the information, however at half that speed I would find a comfortable speed where I have full comprehension of everything my eyes scan. The human body naturally doesn't lift much more than 200 pounds, but when super athletes are conditioned to power lift weights in excess of that, 200 seems like a peanut. Understand?

[xeno]Julios wrote:Not once have I ever seen you say:

"Ah ok that makes sense"

or

"wow cool never thought of that"

or

"perhaps, but what about this?"

Because it doesn't make sense. Because I have thought of that. You're like, "Maybe the next apple you bite into will taste like an orange." Sorry, I'm right and you're wrong.

[xeno]Julios wrote:So, my question is: where are these clinical studies - not saying they don't exist - i'd just like to review them.

Are you a cock?

The Mayo Clinic, the World's Leading Medical Facility wrote:A vegetarian diet generally contains less total fat, saturated fat and cholesterol and includes more dietary fiber. And vegetarians have lower rates of some cancers, cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes.

What a cock.

Gee, rep didn't prove a damn thing. What a shocker.

... I proved everything, idiot.

You proved that you're a fucking moron, and that's pretty much it.

Just take that last "quote" from the Mayo Clinic. Nowhere does that prove that meat causes cancer. Nowhere. If you think it does, then you need your head examined.

[url=http://www.mayoclinic.com/invoke.cfm?objectid=89AFCCB3-E1F7-4541-9A90745760BAA899]Are you out of your mind?

If people who don't eat meat are less likely to get cancer, then what does that say about people who do eat meat?

You're a first class dipshit.[/url]

You're devoid of a even a smattering of logical thought. First of all, you're attributing something to the Mayo Clinic without citing the actual article in which it was published. Then you're making a broad generalization about two different diets with the implication that ONE SINGLE component is the root cause of alleged lower cancer rates.
I'm not saying that vegan diets are fundamentally unhealthy or that all meat in any amount is good for you. I'm simply stating that you're not proving your case(s) and that you couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper bag.

Nightshade wrote:You're devoid of a even a smattering of logical thought. First of all, you're attributing something to the Mayo Clinic without citing the actual article in which it was published. Then you're making a broad generalization about two different diets with the implication that ONE SINGLE component is the root cause of alleged lower cancer rates.
I'm not saying that vegan diets are fundamentally unhealthy or that all meat in any amount is good for you. I'm simply stating that you're not proving your case(s) and that you couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper bag.

Why don't you check the above link, you fucking imbecile. Then read these.

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/83/ ... genumber=2

http://www.vegsource.com/harris/b_cancer.htm

http://www.vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm

http://www.pcrm.org/health/Info_on_Veg_Diets/dairy.html

http://www.pcrm.org/health/Preventive_M ... ntion.html

http://www.mayoclinic.com/invoke.cfm?ob ... 5760BAA899

rep wrote:[url=http://www.mayoclinic.com/invoke.cfm?objectid=89AFCCB3-E1F7-4541-9A90745760BAA899]Are you out of your mind?

If people who don't eat meat are less likely to get cancer, then what does that say about people who do eat meat?

You're a first class dipshit.[/url]

:lol: HAHAHAHAH :lol:

Funniest thing I've heard all day.

I really like your logic Rep. You're a grade A retard. :lol: :lol: :lol:

What's the opposite of up? Thanks.

rep wrote:What's the opposite of up? Thanks.

HAHAHA

Ok ok ok, you honestly need to read up on statistics. Cancer has SEVERAL factors. Generalizing on only one is idiotic.

I suggest you go back to elementary school, they cover it extensivelly.

rep wrote:
Why don't you check the above link, you fucking imbecile. Then read these.

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/83/ ... genumber=2

http://www.vegsource.com/harris/b_cancer.htm

http://www.vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm

http://www.pcrm.org/health/Info_on_Veg_Diets/dairy.html

http://www.pcrm.org/health/Preventive_M ... ntion.html

http://www.mayoclinic.com/invoke.cfm?ob ... 5760BAA899

There was no reference whatsoever to cancer in the first link you posted, you fucking mongoloid. None.
I'll look through the above links later, and while they may show some supporting evidence, YOUR argument is shot full of holes.

Consider the following:

The Institute of Dumbfuckery wrote:People who shoot heroin and rob banks are more likely die prematurely than nerds like rep that attend Star Trek conventions on a regular basis. Therefore, drug use is immediately fatal.

Now, we all know heroin is bad, but is it THE deciding factor in deaths of bank robbing junkies? You can't say. YOU think you can, but that's because you're retarded.

vegsource.com :lol:

ow can you ave any puddin if you doen eat your meat?

rep wrote:What's the opposite of up? Thanks.

thats really the dumbest logic to date
:icon14: i salute you