Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:18 pm
I will steal the source and throw it in a volcano so it can reach the earth's core where implosion will follow thus destroying all copies of q3 :icon34:
Your world is waiting...
https://www.quake3world.com/forum/
Here's one.glossy wrote:anyone know of one of these projects starting up?
Code: Select all
admin status|addip|removeip|listips|map|gametype|timelimit|vote|mute|unmute
Code: Select all
cgame_q3e_x86.dll | qagame_q3e_x86.dll | ui_q3e_x86.dll
Reverse CTF is basically the same as normal CTF except you take your flag to the enemies flag (requires their flag to be there)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mp3#Licens ... ent_issuesensiform wrote: - MP3 Support
The
controversy was created by the removal of this line in the old MP3 royalty licensing page (courtesy of Internet Wayback Machine) from the current version: "No license fee is expected for desktop software mp3 decoders/players that are distributed free-of-charge via the Internet for personal use of end-users."
But the lack of these few words on the latest version of the MP3 licensing Web site does not represent a change in Thomson's policy.
Arland says Ogg Vorbis is apparently using this small Web site wording change "to get publicity," and that if Ogg Vorbis or anyone else wants to produce multimedia encoders and players and give them away, that's fine with Thomson. But he said Thomson does not do that and never has; that its policy has always been to allow free use of the company's MP3 patents in "freely distributable software" while charging royalties to all commercial software or hardware makers that use Thomson's MP3 technology.
And from their licensing page i'm guessing winamp either payed a one time fee or charges extra per copy for fraunhofer.Arland says Thomson not only allows but encourages the use of MP3 technology in free client-side players. He also says Thomson has no plans to start charging royalties to producers of freely-distributed MP3 player software, and that "it would not be in our best interests to do so." But, he says several times -- using slightly different words each time -- the second you sell software or hardware that contains Thomson's patented technology, the company wants money, and this is not negotiable, GPL or no GPL.
mp3 patent and software license
This patent and software license license covers patents and mp3 software (Windows, MacOS object code libraries) developed by Fraunhofer IIS-A.
Decoder · US$ 0.75 per unit or US$ 60 000.00 one-time paid-up
Encoder / Codec · US$ 5.00 per unit
mp3 patent-only license
This patent-only license is needed in case the mp3 software is developed in-house or licensed from a third party.
Decoder · US$ 0.75 per unit or US$ 50 000.00 one-time paid-up
Encoder / Codec · US$ 2.50 per unit
Winamp Free is freely distributed, so it would be free to use the decoder. Winamp Pro is a pay-for program and as such would be applicable to licencing fees.Survivor wrote:And from their licensing page i'm guessing winamp either payed a one time fee or charges extra per copy for fraunhofer.
mp3 patent and software license
This patent and software license license covers patents and mp3 software (Windows, MacOS object code libraries) developed by Fraunhofer IIS-A.
Decoder · US$ 0.75 per unit or US$ 60 000.00 one-time paid-up
Encoder / Codec · US$ 5.00 per unit
mp3 patent-only license
This patent-only license is needed in case the mp3 software is developed in-house or licensed from a third party.
Decoder · US$ 0.75 per unit or US$ 50 000.00 one-time paid-up
Encoder / Codec · US$ 2.50 per unit
On MS WinXP, is it really a problem - I thought you could playback through Directshow and/or other parts of the windows system like ACM because it comes with an MP3 decoder by default.Timbo wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mp3#Licens ... ent_issuesensiform wrote: - MP3 Support