

http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/93375?fp=1
Oh come on, you do realise there's a difference between using teleprompters or autocue or whatever it's called and scribbling notes on the palm of your hand as if it's a seventh graders math test.GONNAFISTYA wrote:Two questions:
1) Why are people laughing about this when Obama can't tell his daughters a bed-time story without teleprompters?
I assume you're referring to news sites here rather than individuals on this forum, right?GONNAFISTYA wrote: 2) The most important question: Why are people still talking about Sarah Palin and the Tea Partyers like they actually matter? They're a bunch of crazy, racist rednecks...who cares what they do or say? They matter in politics as much as the KKK does...zilch.
Seriously...every single news item I've seen that mentions Sarah Palin or the birthers/tea party idiots I've skipped right over.
While I've cracked jokes that Palin can/might be elected, the only reason it a possibility and the only reason that it would ever come about is because people KEEP her in the news...like she's relevant to anything besides birthing a retard.
There are a lot of idiots out there that actually support these fucking morons and the Republicans are more than willing to embrace them.GONNAFISTYA wrote:
2) The most important question: Why are people still talking about Sarah Palin and the Tea Partyers like they actually matter? They're a bunch of crazy, racist rednecks...who cares what they do or say? They matter in politics as much as the KKK does...zilch.
The reason I don't think there's much difference is because both Obama and Palin are trying to ensure that they're (in some way) prepared to regurgitate what they're supposed to say to their audiences correctly. Don't get me wrong, there is no comparison in their intellect as Obama clearly doesn't need the teleprompters in a real debate, but as it relates to a speech, they're basically doing the same thing.Eraser wrote:Oh come on, you do realise there's a difference between using teleprompters or autocue or whatever it's called and scribbling notes on the palm of your hand as if it's a seventh graders math test.GONNAFISTYA wrote:Two questions:
1) Why are people laughing about this when Obama can't tell his daughters a bed-time story without teleprompters?
Right.Eraser wrote:I assume you're referring to news sites here rather than individuals on this forum, right?
My point exactly. Why legitimize the retards?Nightshade wrote:There are a lot of idiots out there that actually support these fucking morons and the Republicans are more than willing to embrace them.GONNAFISTYA wrote:
2) The most important question: Why are people still talking about Sarah Palin and the Tea Partyers like they actually matter? They're a bunch of crazy, racist rednecks...who cares what they do or say? They matter in politics as much as the KKK does...zilch.
I can't agree that it's the same thing. There's a certain difference in the level of professionalism here. It just looks really moronic when you're using notes written on your hand, especially when you want to be taken seriously as a politician. I don't know if Obama ever really tried to cover up the fact that he used teleprompters, but sneaking notes on your hand clearly is an effort to keep it hidden.GONNAFISTYA wrote: The reason I don't think there's much difference is because both Obama and Palin are trying to ensure that they're (in some way) prepared to regurgitate what they're supposed to say to their audiences correctly. Don't get me wrong, there is no comparison in their intellect as Obama clearly doesn't need the teleprompters in a real debate, but as it relates to a speech, they're basically doing the same thing.
Oh jesus christ.Eraser wrote:I can't agree that it's the same thing. There's a certain difference in the level of professionalism here. It just looks really moronic when you're using notes written on your hand, especially when you want to be taken seriously as a politician. I don't know if Obama ever really tried to cover up the fact that he used teleprompters, but sneaking notes on your hand clearly is an effort to keep it hidden.GONNAFISTYA wrote: The reason I don't think there's much difference is because both Obama and Palin are trying to ensure that they're (in some way) prepared to regurgitate what they're supposed to say to their audiences correctly. Don't get me wrong, there is no comparison in their intellect as Obama clearly doesn't need the teleprompters in a real debate, but as it relates to a speech, they're basically doing the same thing.
Also, in the video U4EA posted you can see she glances at her hand during an interview. That's not a speech.
GONNAFISTYA wrote:Just like when people stop talking about Micheal Jackson
Of course it blows the mind. But what you are forgetting is that she could have fucking phoned it in (with a static picture of her on a screen) and people still would love her.Tsakali wrote:not to mention, you need a teleprompter because there is an entire speech there...the fact that she can't handle memorizing as much as a phrase, and had to resort to writing on her palm, is what blows the mind.
Obama couldn't write on his hand with a pen.. he'd have to use white out.Eraser wrote:
I can't agree that it's the same thing. There's a certain difference in the level of professionalism here. It just looks really moronic when you're using notes written on your hand, especially when you want to be taken seriously as a politician. I don't know if Obama ever really tried to cover up the fact that he used teleprompters, but sneaking notes on your hand clearly is an effort to keep it hidden.
Also, in the video U4EA posted you can see she glances at her hand during an interview. That's not a speech.
lol...a friend of mine simply could NOT shut up about Micheal Jackson when he died...about how he was "a wonderful person" and all that other crap. All I said about Micheal Jackson (over and over) was "you're fawning over a known child molester" and "Micheal Jackson fiddled little boys" and that "Micheal Jackson hung his infant son out a window in Germany just to get his photo taken".andyman wrote:you can diafGONNAFISTYA wrote:Just like when people stop talking about Micheal Jackson
Wow dude, you really get your pants in a knot over these sorts of things don't you? Obsessed much?GONNAFISTYA wrote:Seriously...just drop it already.
andyman wrote:Obama couldn't write on his hand with a pen.. he'd have to use white out.
cuz he's black.
lolGONNAFISTYA wrote:lol...a friend of mine simply could NOT shut up about Micheal Jackson when he died...about how he was "a wonderful person" and all that other crap. All I said about Micheal Jackson (over and over) was "you're fawning over a known child molester" and "Micheal Jackson fiddled little boys" and that "Micheal Jackson hung his infant son out a window in Germany just to get his photo taken".andyman wrote: you can diaf
Yes...my friend got pissed at me.
i like how she crossed out 'budget' in 'budget cuts' and changed it to 'tax cuts'Tsakali wrote:not to mention, you need a teleprompter because there is an entire speech there...the fact that she can't handle memorizing as much as a phrase, and had to resort to writing on her palm, is what blows the mind.
