this is fucking awesome.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:24 pm

http://gawker.com/5941326/ask-the-dnc-i ... -kill-list

just watch the video

Post by **bitWISE** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:31 pm

why is this awesome?

Post by **Psyche911** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:12 pm

What is this guys point? I can't even tell if he's in favor of Romney or Obama. The situation isn't good politics for either side, and arguably unconstitutional.

So yeah, why is this awesome? He's basically just a troll.

Post by **xer0s** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:14 pm

Post by **Tsakali** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:26 pm

bitWISE wrote:why is this awesome?

Post by **obsidian** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:35 pm

It's awesome because it proves the point that all blogs run by Gawker media are staffed by writers who are sensationalist morons lacking an ounce of journalistic credability. The Fox News of blogs tries to paint a massive red target and then aims the arrow the other way.

Post by **0psys** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:32 pm

This is not fucking awesome.

Post by **0psys** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:37 pm

Actually, what was vaguely awesome was Clinton's DNC speech.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:28 pm

:facepalm:

It's awesome because he's trying to get democrats to comment on Obama's use of an extra-judicial kill list (of American citizens) using a novel way to phrase the question and raise the issue.

Post by **seremtan** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:29 pm

this comes across a lot like gawker trying to do the daily show thing, but not nearly as well as john oliver would have done it

Post by **0psys** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:32 pm

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote::facepalm:

It's awesome because he's trying to get democrats to comment on Obama's use of an extra-judicial kill list (of American citizens) using a novel way to phrase the question and raise the issue.

Oh.

Post by **Nightshade** » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:44 am

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote::facepalm:

It's awesome because he's trying to get democrats to comment on Obama's use of an extra-judicial kill list (of American citizens) using a novel way to phrase the question and raise the issue.

It's not awesome because he fails miserably. It's not a novel way to bring up the issue, it's an ineffective one, because it just gives people the easy out of just spewing some bullshit about Romney. So, great issue, worthy of stuffing in people's faces, but poorly executed and therefore not awesome.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:16 am

I thought the reactions were telling.
Didn't think he failed. He asked a good question that fucked (the elected people who were questioned) up.

SCREW YOU ALL

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:25 pm

Psyche911 wrote:What is this guys point? I can't even tell if he's in favor of Romney or Obama. The situation isn't good politics for either side, and arguably unconstitutional.

So yeah, why is this awesome? He's basically just a troll.

You nailed it. He's not for either side. he's for the US Constitution.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:55 pm

a good discussion of the issue here: (video)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46979738/vp ... 1#48959382

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46979738/vp ... 1#48959480

Post by **GONNAFISTYA** » Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:19 pm

Chris Hayes' show has really impressed me.

Post by **seremtan** » Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:04 pm

just split the country in two: liberals on the coasts, conservatives in the midwest - that way one side or another can get a real majority, and people can vote with their feet

this is fucking awesome.

this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.

Re: this is fucking awesome.