An objective opinion is an opinion with no biases. Not being able to vote isn't a qualifier of an objective opinion because it doesn't eliminate the possibility of bias, especially since Canada has a similar political climate to the US.

"Trump for President if we can't have The Bern although I would love to see them as running mates with Trump as VP."

"I personally cringe at what he says 50% of the time"

"Trump 2016 .. or Bernie"

"Trump could sink his bid for president or cement it.
I am rooting for Carson but Americans are being told to vote for Rubio so the debate will be unfairly moderated.
It could be quite a show."

"The media has decided that Hillary should be president. I like Bernie, his past stances (predictions) and votes on the very most important issues turned out to be the right ones."

"Carson out "

"My comments lately (some of my much earlier comments are dumb) are my way of predicting the process as I see it moving forward since this is the first election I have followed since Day 1 and I am engaged (probably addicted as well).

I am not pushing anyone in Trumps direction, I am simply vocalizing what i think.
I will keep my predictions and thoughts to myself.
I like Trump and telling you guys what I think (like it or not) has not turned out well.
My fault so I will stop posting what I think about the election, the process and the players.
It's a no win game, we see things differently which is fine.

You Won .. congrats but Trump will still be your president, you better fight harder then beating axbaby if you don't want that to happen."

surprised at what exactly?

by the way, he made a mistake in postponing the rally. or maybe he really is just a pussy after all?

Spurs fan and Britain’s most dangerous prisoner Charles Bronson, 61, ‘smears himself in butter before taking on TWELVE officers after Arsenal win the FA Cup’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z42nv7Fd00
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

All about the butter

Are we still talking about President Trump?

Much of the answer can be found in academic research into political behavior that political scientists refer to as authoritarianism. According to this theory, authoritarians are a group of voters who prize order and conformity, and feel deeply threatened by social change, influxes of outsiders, and hierarchies being upended. When threatened, authoritarians support strongman leaders who promise drastic, decisive action to cast out outsiders and restore order.

This theory goes a long way to explaining what's happening at these rallies: The protesters whom Trump is encouraging his supporters to attack are walking, talking manifestations of the kinds of social change that Trump supporters fear. Fomenting and supporting violence against the protesters is a way for Trump to show authoritarian voters that he can be the kind of leader they crave.

https://www.rt.com/usa/335398-trump-defenders-group-protests/

Jeeeeesus... starting to get a little frightning now.