Who wants to join me for some wakeboarding in the lake?

[scared?]

It rarely drops that low and now that they are limiting water for the rice farmers it should be a problem... Also, Austin uses less water now than they did in 1990... Conservation...

Lake stays in normal range for decades at a time...

[xer0s]

Geoff at the lake...

[lvlshot]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_P6RbXBRMZV8/S6-eIwc9VBI/AAAAAAAADGE/q9fjDdACnSc/s1600/dunes-1.jpg[/lvlshot]

[Chupacabra]

Lake Travis

Really? That's weird. It's been an extremely rainy year in Texas.

[seremtan]

even the rain avoids geoff's poverty

[shaft]

It rarely drops that low and now that they are limiting water for the rice farmers it should be a problem... Also, Austin uses less water now than they did in 1990... Conservation...

Lake stays in normal range for decades at a time...

No it doesn't. Real lakes don't have special docks because the water level drops 40ft every other year.

[scared?]

Yes it does....
http://www.lcra.org/water/river-and-wea ... evels.aspx

[seremtan]

[scared?]

Like I said it's usually in the normal range for decades at a time... Lol on my cock moron... I win..

[seremtan]

wrong, numbnuts. only a moron cherry-picks part of the data and calls it the "normal range", especially when the data only goes back to 1943, and double especially when the "normal range" (lol) excludes obvious drought periods, one of which is happening right now

oh, and triple especially when the trend of the last 10 years is downward

[scared?]

There is no drought happening right now u fucking idiot... The drought ended long ago...

[scared?]

BTW.. The first large dip on that chart was just improper management of a new lake system... The second was a decade long drought... Then 60 years later another one... So we could go 60 years with normal ranges again... I win... ...

[shaft]

Texas logic

[Flex Donkey]

wrong, numbnuts. only a moron cherry-picks part of the data and calls it the "normal range", especially when the data only goes back to 1943, and double especially when the "normal range" (lol) excludes obvious drought periods, one of which is happening right now

oh, and triple especially when the trend of the last 10 years is downward

Lol.

[Pext]

wrong, numbnuts. only a moron cherry-picks part of the data and calls it the "normal range", especially when the data only goes back to 1943, and double especially when the "normal range" (lol) excludes obvious drought periods, one of which is happening right now

oh, and triple especially when the trend of the last 10 years is downward

pwnt

[scared?]

Y'all jellus of my lake and the future boat that will dominate all of u... Understandable... Can u periscope with gopro?.... ...

[scared?]

BTW...

[Flex Donkey]

Got any of those pics from this decade?

[scared?]

Domination!...

[Flex Donkey]

I guess that's a no.

[scared?]

U gonna be okay?... Do U need a hug homo?...

[Flex Donkey]

Yeah I'd like that.

[seremtan]

BTW.. The first large dip on that chart was just improper management of a new lake system... The second was a decade long drought... Then 60 years later another one... So we could go 60 years with normal ranges again... I win... ...

"normal ranges"

[scared?]

Normally I'd just murder a moron like u... But I'll pity let u live cuz Christmas... Ur welcome ..

[scared?]

Our boat ramp will be submerged in water soon... DOMINATION!...

[Flex Donkey]

From the tears you'll be crying after looking upon your dried up ditch.