U.S. Election
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: U.S. Election
Le Penn was on Marr this morning. She was far more terrifying than Trump has ever been.
Re: U.S. Election
Don't forget prime minister Wilders. We have our elections here in March.seremtan wrote:i'm very much looking forward to Memphis's 'President Le Pen' thread that should be coming along some time in early new year - if not sooner!
Re: U.S. Election
Europe sinking deeper and deeper into a cesspit of far-right nationalism and stupidity, just like I predicted.
Re: U.S. Election
He had to go search 4chan for an opinion to copy paste here. These things take time.
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:15 am
Re: U.S. Election

Linda McMahon is going to be Sec. of Commerce lol
Re: U.S. Election
[youtube]T8npegAGM2E[/youtube]
Re: U.S. Election
This is amazing!
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/8aLBH24.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/8aLBH24.jpg[/lvlshot]
Re: U.S. Election
Sanders/Warren 2020!
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: U.S. Election
so trump is already backing up on most of what he was promising... he was on 60 minutes and said he will think about charging hillary, repeating several times "i dont want to hurt her".. looks like he might be scared to go through with this.
Re: U.S. Election
Of course he's backing down, he's a compulsive liar. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: U.S. Election
Yeah it's always going to go this way. HoR will block anything they don't like, so if he's told something will be blocked then he won't try to save face.dubz wrote:so trump is already backing up on most of what he was promising... he was on 60 minutes and said he will think about charging hillary, repeating several times "i dont want to hurt her".. looks like he might be scared to go through with this.
Re: U.S. Election
dude, he's backing away from the crazy shit. never interrupt someone when they're doing the right thingRyoki wrote:Of course he's backing down, he's a compulsive liar. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
Re: U.S. Election
this is a joke, right?QuakeSteve wrote:Linda McMahon is going to be Sec. of Commerce lol
Re: U.S. Election
prob not. she failed running for senate twice and spent $54 million out of pocket on the last run.
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:15 am
Re: U.S. Election
German Press is still in "Panic-Mode"
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/N6kL5eY.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/LIaBn3J.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/N6kL5eY.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/LIaBn3J.jpg[/lvlshot]
Die Vitamine sind in der Dose gefangen!!!
Re: U.S. Election
unpaid internship? no mention of salary
i guess successful applicants will be culturally enriched instead
i guess successful applicants will be culturally enriched instead

Re: U.S. Election
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/14/trump-re ... uties.html
A source told NBC News that Drumpf asked President Barack Obama during their Thursday meeting how many White House staffers he could replace. And when the sitting president responded that Drumpf gets to staff just about the entire White House, the president-elect was surprised, NBC's source said.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: U.S. Election
Chrome plugin FTW. 

[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: U.S. Election
An AGP(above ground pool) prophecy or puppet presidency?


Re: U.S. Election
I think Dutchies are in general a lot more level headed about these things than our American counterparts, although the scale has slowly been sliding in the wrong direction.Memphis wrote:Soros apparently scouring for useful idiots in Dutchieland...
You're next
What I find funny though, is that they say that they will have 50% male and 50% female participants to remain inclusive (advocate of the devil comment: how about fluid gender people?), but that statement inherently means that more qualified people may be excluded due to them being the "wrong" gender.