building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:29 pm

sometimes u win WHEN u argue...sometime u crush the living fuck out of themmmPWNED....

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:30 pm

any questions?

Post by **SplishSplash** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:31 pm

Fender wrote:pic

If you don't care, just say so.

Post by **Fender** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:32 pm

Obviously, by posting in this thread I care.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:32 pm

Some floors must have had large I-beams. Otherwise the building's tube-within-a-tube design made no sense. :lol:

quality 'analysis' :icon26:

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:33 pm

great icon fender

Post by **losCHUNK** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:36 pm

this looks like reason for a poll

edit: wheres the polls gone

Post by **R00k** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:37 pm

Post by **Transient** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:38 pm

Freakaloin wrote:thats a myth dude...they were designed for fully loaded planes...u just heard that on the news or something...its not true, and in fact the planes could have withstood multiple impacts from fully loaded planes...that knocking the fireproofing off the steel is only a theory which tries to explain why the steel melted when the temps were so low...just a theory...

Actually, no, they weren't. They planned for planes to hit it, but not fully loaded, fully fueled planes that were larger than the largest commercial plane at the time. They planned for an impact from a plane that was half-fueled and lost in a fog, not going full throttle at an angle to optimize structural impact.

You're right about the fires not being too terribly hot, but remember that these planes were going 500 MPH when they hit, knocking all the fireproofing right off the beams. Fire was the cause of the collapse, no doubt.

edit: that and the fuckers who flew the plane into the buildings. I'd say it was mostly their fault

So what you're saying is that what I heard on the news is wrong, and what only exists as a theory in your head is right? Excuse me if I don't believe you.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:42 pm

no i'm telling u that the buildings were designed to handle multiple impacts from fully loaded jumbojets...if u heard something different it was false information...and u fell for it...owned by the msm...rofl...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:22 pm

god i owned this thread...its obvious wtc was brought down by explosives...