no coronavirus thread ?
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-52955868
In other news, a stones throw away from my work this has finally happened
In other news, a stones throw away from my work this has finally happened
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Nice touch, throwing it in the water. 
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Sure, if you’re ok with littering...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I'm sure it'll make a good habitat for some fish and sea life honestly...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
#oceanlifematters
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
got to wonder why it was standing even before it got yeeted
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
When you use your slave trade money to become a philanthropist...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
or use your software money to become a philanthropist
#gateslivesmatter
#gateslivesmatter
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Aren't vaccines kind of like software updates?
#gowithwhatyouknow
#gowithwhatyouknow
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
lol @ anti-vaxxers still stuck on win 95
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Anonymous hacker calling himself Nature working on Covid20
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
More Americans have now died from covid than died during WW1... Lol?...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Actually way more... Moron alert^^^...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
why are you such a lazy deadbeat who can't do basic research?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War ... E2%80%9318
https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps ... 7b48e9ecf6
WW1: 117,466 (military + civilian deaths due to military action)
Covid-19: 113,820
i.e. "not quite"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War ... E2%80%9318
https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps ... 7b48e9ecf6
WW1: 117,466 (military + civilian deaths due to military action)
Covid-19: 113,820
i.e. "not quite"
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
You're Covid number is low. As of last night there were 116,252 covid deaths in us. 116k deaths in ww1. But the covid numbers are much lower than what's being reported (excessive deaths way up this year... Most prolly covid). Just as in ww1.. the causality numbers lagged for years... So u see... Ur a moron... :olo: ...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
not my numbers. i provided the links, use them if you know how to point and click
also, your original post was that covid numbers were higher than WW1 but your follow-up post claimed the numbers were the same, dumbass :olo:
also, your original post was that covid numbers were higher than WW1 but your follow-up post claimed the numbers were the same, dumbass :olo:
-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Officially number of us deaths at the end of ww1 were lower than 100k.. numbers usually get revised up. The official numbers of covid deaths is lower than actual. So yes, more Americans have died from covid than ww1... U lose again semencan...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
"revised" means corrected. also, please share your source for the "actual" number of US covid fatalities
damn you're dumber than Trump
damn you're dumber than Trump
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Massive flare up of cases in Texas. lol, dumb Texans?...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
[youtube]/hT47Ysl-2Ew[/youtube]
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Just tested negative on my first test. Heading back in a couple of weeks since I had to return to the office this week.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
You mean you tested positively... in... another sense. You tested positively towards negative.raw wrote:Just tested negative on my first test. Heading back in a couple of weeks since I had to return to the office this week.
[youtube]tNiqWjDAm8M[/youtube]