no coronavirus thread ?
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I think it’s pretty obvious where Gramps stands on this issue. He just doesn’t want to say it. Instead, he’d rather try to fool us into reading some bullshit disguised as factual news...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
That's my point, it's tough to figure out what's accurate. Even on that site, confirmed cases for China is 84k... like give me a break, I don't buy that bullshit. You're telling me the country where the outbreak began with a population in the billions has had less infections than a country with 40 million people (Canada). The sources of information are heavily biased no matter which side is doing the reporting.Doombrain wrote:Or you could just look at the distilled data...
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboar ... 7b48e9ecf6
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Not to mention, that site is always at least a day behind the other site Whiskey links. Which by the way shows the daily deaths in US yesterday at 285 which is considerably less than it was just a couple of weeks ago at around 1500 a day. It's been dropping quite a bit in the last few days. Whether it stays that way will show in the next couple of weeks. The increase in positive results could also be enhanced by the increased testing that has been happening in addition to opening back up/protests/etc. Too early to tell at this point.Κracus wrote:
That's my point, it's tough to figure out what's accurate. Even on that site, confirmed cases for China is 84k... like give me a break, I don't buy that bullshit. You're telling me the country where the outbreak began with a population in the billions has had less infections than a country with 40 million people (Canada). The sources of information are heavily biased no matter which side is doing the reporting.
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I have to agree with this; there is no way that Chyna only has that many cases.Κracus wrote:That's my point, it's tough to figure out what's accurate. Even on that site, confirmed cases for China is 84k... like give me a break, I don't buy that bullshit. You're telling me the country where the outbreak began with a population in the billions has had less infections than a country with 40 million people (Canada). The sources of information are heavily biased no matter which side is doing the reporting.Doombrain wrote:Or you could just look at the distilled data...
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboar ... 7b48e9ecf6
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I'm preparing to loose the job I'm doing probably around November, 1st.
Tourism hasn't come up although possible for more than a month. We've had disastrous numbers.
If the numbers keep on like this we will make 1 miliion in deficit by the end of this year.
Game over, unless the summer vacations can rescue us. But I really doubt it.
40+, will have to look for some alternative. Even going into an apprenticeship is a possibility.
I regard it as a chance instead of a catastrophe.
Tourism hasn't come up although possible for more than a month. We've had disastrous numbers.
If the numbers keep on like this we will make 1 miliion in deficit by the end of this year.
Game over, unless the summer vacations can rescue us. But I really doubt it.
40+, will have to look for some alternative. Even going into an apprenticeship is a possibility.
I regard it as a chance instead of a catastrophe.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Reported cases Worldwide
23 June 9,329,404
27 June 9,906,585
29 June 10,395,643
Total deaths
• World 507,416
• USA 128,767
• Brazil 58,314
Source #1
Source #2
23 June 9,329,404
27 June 9,906,585
29 June 10,395,643
Total deaths
• World 507,416
• USA 128,767
• Brazil 58,314
Source #1
Source #2
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
That is positive thinkingFerrao10 wrote:........... an apprenticeship is a possibility....
If I were younger and looking for a vocation/career change, an apprenticeship would be something I'd look at. Just a thought, what about a male hair dresser/barber apprenticeship ? People will always need them and cash in lieu of electronic payment might be helpful tax wise

[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Fuck off.Whiskey 7 wrote:Just a thought, what about a male hair dresser/barber
Edit: they make like 9€/hour here. No, definitely not. I have been working as an audio/video/lighting- technician for the last 20 years without apprenticeship. That's what I'm thinking about.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I especially love the hastily-Photoshopped graphs. :olo:Eraser wrote:Gramps links to a site where the very first thing you see is this:
"Anyone can publish on Medium per our Policies, but we don’t fact-check every story. For more info about the coronavirus, see cdc.gov."
:olo:
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
What part of the article are you having problems with? Was it the title? Was it all the charts and graphs? Maybe it was the 50+ sources referenced at the end? Do you not believe the content of the article? If not. What do you believe?Eraser wrote:Gramps links to a site where the very first thing you see is this:
"Anyone can publish on Medium per our Policies, but we don’t fact-check every story. For more info about the coronavirus, see cdc.gov."
:olo:
Do you believe when the WHO says there is no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission?
https://www.who.int/csr/don/12-january- ... -china/en/
Do you believe when the WHO says Covid-19 is not a global emergency?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/heal ... gency.html
Do you believe when the US Surgeon General and CDC say masks do not prevent the spread of Covid-19?
https://twitter.com/Surgeon_General/sta ... 00304.html
Or do you believe when the CDC says masks do prevent the spread of Covid-19?
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... dance.html
Do you believe when the CDC says Covid-19 spreads easily on surfaces?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/c ... story.html
Or do you believe when the CDC says Covid-19 doesn’t spread easily on surfaces?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2 ... te-states/
Do you believe when the WHO says asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19 is rare?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/health/c ... index.html
Or do you believe when the WHO says asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19 is not rare?
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/09/who-scr ... known.html
Do you believe the CDC mixed viral and antibody testing?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/health/c ... index.html
Or do you need a likely biased fact checker to tell you what to believe/partially believe?
-
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Don't worry Gwamps it will all be over for you soon.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Yeah, shield your eyes from all of the deaths.
How did people die in Italy? So many in such a short time?
The normal flue? Yeah, right. First time in like, ever.
Answer just that one question.
How did people die in Italy? So many in such a short time?
The normal flue? Yeah, right. First time in like, ever.
Answer just that one question.
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Why don't you read the article? There's a quite reasonable explanation.Ferrao10 wrote:Yeah, shield your eyes from all of the deaths.
How did people die in Italy? So many in such a short time?
The normal flue? Yeah, right. First time in like, ever.
Answer just that one question.
BTW, I'm not saying the virus isn't real. It's very real.
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Yup IM-SuKKNNuTZ, as soon as the election is over we'll be on to something else.HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:Don't worry Gwamps it will all be over for you soon.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I don't need to read your "article" really.
I just have to look at how lockdowns are lifted and COVID-19 spreads and what experts all around the world tell their leaders to do.
Trump has his own vision. Good luck following it.
What do you mean by
"as soon as the election is over we'll be on to something else" ?
I just have to look at how lockdowns are lifted and COVID-19 spreads and what experts all around the world tell their leaders to do.
Trump has his own vision. Good luck following it.
What do you mean by
"as soon as the election is over we'll be on to something else" ?
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Yeah don't bother reading, you might suffer from exposure to an alternate source of information and that'd be terrible.
What did you not understand about that sentence?
What did you not understand about that sentence?
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
alternate source of information :olo:
Here's some alternate "facts".
https://www.gzeromedia.com/the-graphic- ... s-eu-vs-us
Here's some alternate "facts".
https://www.gzeromedia.com/the-graphic- ... s-eu-vs-us
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
What, you mean you don't trust a graph edited in the Snipping tool from a "Covid Calculator" that lets you play around with your own numbers???
Maybe you just need an open mind to alternate sources of information..
[lvlshot]https://miro.medium.com/max/2000/1*YO70xrW3oGLGZ9vL60YNeQ.png[/lvlshot]
:tard: :clownboat:
Maybe you just need an open mind to alternate sources of information..
[lvlshot]https://miro.medium.com/max/2000/1*YO70xrW3oGLGZ9vL60YNeQ.png[/lvlshot]
:tard: :clownboat:
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Doombrain wrote:alternate source of information :olo:
Here's some alternate "facts".
https://www.gzeromedia.com/the-graphic- ... s-eu-vs-us
Good thing is the US will be a great baseline to see if your country is doing well in terms of it's covid response. Thanks Trump!
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
This dumb motherfucker doesn’t know how science works. The experts/scientists gather current data and draw conclusions by that set of data. They're then able to give their best guidance using the most current data. Once new data comes in, different conclusions can and will be made. They’ll then have to adjust their guidance to suit the new data. This is a flowing crisis. Not some decades long pandemic like HIV where you can give concrete advice.YourGrandpa wrote:What part of the article are you having problems with? Was it the title? Was it all the charts and graphs? Maybe it was the 50+ sources referenced at the end? Do you not believe the content of the article? If not. What do you believe?Eraser wrote:Gramps links to a site where the very first thing you see is this:
"Anyone can publish on Medium per our Policies, but we don’t fact-check every story. For more info about the coronavirus, see cdc.gov."
:olo:
Do you believe when the WHO says there is no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission?
https://www.who.int/csr/don/12-january- ... -china/en/
Do you believe when the WHO says Covid-19 is not a global emergency?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/heal ... gency.html
Do you believe when the US Surgeon General and CDC say masks do not prevent the spread of Covid-19?
https://twitter.com/Surgeon_General/sta ... 00304.html
Or do you believe when the CDC says masks do prevent the spread of Covid-19?
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... dance.html
Do you believe when the CDC says Covid-19 spreads easily on surfaces?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/c ... story.html
Or do you believe when the CDC says Covid-19 doesn’t spread easily on surfaces?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2 ... te-states/
Do you believe when the WHO says asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19 is rare?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/health/c ... index.html
Or do you believe when the WHO says asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19 is not rare?
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/09/who-scr ... known.html
Do you believe the CDC mixed viral and antibody testing?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/health/c ... index.html
Or do you need a likely biased fact checker to tell you what to believe/partially believe?
I feel like I shouldn’t have to explain this to a 50 year old man. But he’ll never see it, cause he blocks my posts. It’s an honor really. Gotten to...:olo:
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Blocking posts is a sure sign of being a bad person who can't deal with reality... Lol...
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Or he's just a blockhead :olo:
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Did you see this?Doombrain wrote:alternate source of information :olo:
Here's some alternate "facts".
https://www.gzeromedia.com/the-graphic- ... s-eu-vs-us
[lvlshot]https://scontent.fmia1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/ ... e=5F20B34F[/lvlshot]
Source https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/