no bold and underlinesTurbanator wrote:I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?
Things that need to be done...
-
Underpants?
- Posts: 4755
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am
omfg!lol!rofl!lmao! UR right, U4EALOLRFLOLMAO! that extra 6% is going to waste!!! Fuck me, there are starving children in Mexico (ie. bliusca) who have NO forum whatsoever and like ravenous internet gluttons we're simply tossing unused forum away! your post is neither petty nor does it in any way make you out to be a whining trifling nerd!! :upupupupupupupupupupupupup:U4EA wrote:Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.
-
Turbanator
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
"completely safe" is a bit of a overconfidant place to be.riddla wrote:Here's the list of completely safe HTML tags I have allowed on my phpbb boards:
b,i,u,p,pre,blockquote,br,strong,ul,ol,li,H1,H2,H3,H4,tt
by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)
I just did an <img src="" width=blah> right here .. presumably, it's working .. ?!glossy wrote:by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)
assuming yer still working on the css, i wont say anything about the colordifference between a new and visited link being too subtle
that sentence doesnt make any sense but you know what i mean :A
that sentence doesnt make any sense but you know what i mean :A
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
-
SplishSplash
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am
-
Guest
There was a thread moved from GD to Fix. I posted in it in Fix and the posts showed up in the same thread in GD.
http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=712
http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=712
- Mat Linnett
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2000 7:00 am
- Location: The Grizzly Grotto
-
SplishSplash
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am
This still stands btw. Deleting the cookies didn't help shit, or at least not permanently.SplishSplash wrote:Ok, maybe I'm the only one experiencing this, but:
The "New Reply" arrows don't work correctly (at least not all the time).
Links that I've visited appear as unvisited. This is the only site where I have this problem.
-
prince1000
- Posts: 1892
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:00 am
might want to think about adding a memberlist link again. maybe a link to the avatar gallery as well.
-
Turbanator
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
quite annoying
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
Turbanator
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am