Penn and Teller Bullshit
Penn and Teller Bullshit
First time I came across this and the show is pretty good. Anyone else like it? I've only seen the last 2 episodes of season 3.
Last edited by inphlict on Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Brilliant show. It can be a little biased at times but I take it in stride.
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
There use a lot of profanity, and depending on the episode, some nudity and sexual content. Quite enjoyable.
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
They've done episodes on:
- the Bible (they've got balls)
- Near death experiences
- bottled water
- recycling
- environmental hysteria
- the Patriot Act (most recently)
- Creationism
- Self-help people
among others...
- the Bible (they've got balls)
- Near death experiences
- bottled water
- recycling
- environmental hysteria
- the Patriot Act (most recently)
- Creationism
- Self-help people
among others...
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:55 am
Transient wrote:One of the best shows on TV. I absolutely love it. I have no idea why people allow themselves to be interviewed for the show knowing Penn Gillette is going to rip them a new one, though. :lol:
On one of the episodes they explain that they show the people they interview previous episodes and explain how the show works. The reason why people agree to go on is in Penn's words "These people genuinely believe they are bulletproof".
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
Yeah, I saw the ep they mentioned that in. It still baffles me. :icon26:Pooinyourmouth_needmerge wrote:Transient wrote:One of the best shows on TV. I absolutely love it. I have no idea why people allow themselves to be interviewed for the show knowing Penn Gillette is going to rip them a new one, though. :lol:
On one of the episodes they explain that they show the people they interview previous episodes and explain how the show works. The reason why people agree to go on is in Penn's words "These people genuinely believe they are bulletproof".
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
yea - actually a friend of mine had a copy of it, and thought i'd find it interesting.Dr_Watson wrote:
glad you got around to it... you like it?
had alot of good info, well presented.
It was well made, although I don't think they did much primary research. Rather, they summarized views of classic proponents and opponents. Yet they do include many relevant points.
It was great seeing Edgar Schoen - I knew his papers are wonky, but I never knew he was. It was great to see him completely ommit any mention of penile cancer, as that was his great contribution to the literature on circumcision.
Btw - i always found this quote hilarious - it's taken from a major pro-circumcision site:
http://www.circumcisioninfo.com/index_home_new.htmlAlso, contrary to the claim often repeated by the anti-circumcision lobby, the foreskin is not the only erogenous part of the penis!
Now that the existence of erogenous tissue in the foreskin cannot be ignored (since it's now part of the scientific literature), the best pro-circers can do is to use arguments such as:
"well there are other erogenous parts of the penis - so it's not as bad as ppl make it out to be"
imagine someone justified female circumcision that way:
"well we're only removing the labia - they still have their clit"
Secondly, I have never once seen an anti-circ statement that claimed that the foreskin is the only erogenous part of the penis.