Quick, I need to know whats better 9800 Pro or 6600GT

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

ToxicBug wrote:
Psyche911 wrote:
ToxicBug wrote: Can you unlock the pipelines?
Uh...what pipelines?
It's an entirely differn't chip. The pipelines aren't locked. Are you thinking 6800 > 6800 GT?


And it's hard to say. If it's $275 USD for the 6600GT, then seriously, get the X800XL. It's waaaaay better and for only $25 more. But I really hope that's Canadian $.

What games do you play?

OpenGL = 6600GT
DirectX = 9800 Pro
Oh, I didn't know that. I thought it was something a la 9500pro to 9700pro via a bios flash.
6600GT 6800GT
NV-43 NV-40
11nm 13nm
8 pipelines 16 pipelines
128-bit 256-bit memory bus
3 6 vertex shader units
500MHz 350MHz core clock

The NV-43 was designed from the NV-40, but with the changes above. Even if it did have pipelines to unlock, you would probably be at a serious lack of memory bandwidth.
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

Oh FFS. The text formatting of this forum pisses me off. Can somebody implement some sort of table feature? :(
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

tnf wrote:I have the 6800 GT. BFG. The overclocked one. I love it.

I think turb has the same one.
i ahve the XfX one.. love it to death..
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

In DooM 3, yes.
Try out HL2, or FarCry. I believe the 9800 Pro is faster in either, though not by much.
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Memphis wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:6600GT is a lot better.
Is better..

not OMGWTFBBQPWN better.. but is better non the less..

Go with the 6600gt
Bollocks it is

My 6600GT urinates all over my 9800 pro from 12 storeys up

that must be some hardhitting pee.
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

YOU WHERE R U
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

I CANT SEE J00 NEWB
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Iccy (temp)
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 1:32 am

Post by Iccy (temp) »

I have had both the 9800 pro and the 6600gt.

6600gt is a whole nother level of card. Blows the 9800 away.
" I thought i could handle the power, Ive alway been a kind and gentle person.

But once i was finaly able to split the atom
i built me some bombs and droped them on every mother fucker that got in my way."
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

Psyche911 wrote:In DooM 3, yes.
Try out HL2, or FarCry. I believe the 9800 Pro is faster in either, though not by much.
Look in the URL for the 6600GT in my first post, in FarCry the 6600GT does much better then the 9800 Pro. As for Half-Life 2 it is not exactly that stressful of a game to a graphics card.
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

Those of you with both, are you talking about on the same system (same CPU, RAM, mobo) or 9800 Pro on old system, 6600GT on new system? Because if there's a faster CPU feeding it, yeah it is going to quite a bit better.

And if not, what do you play that this huge difference is so noticable?
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

P.S.
Here's something to corroborate your link with, KOS:

http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2277&p=3

I believe most things posted on Anandtech. Toms is a little sketchy sometimes. But they seem to agree here.

I thought I remembered them being pretty equal when the 6600GT came out. Guess I was wrong. :p
netrex
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 8:00 am

Post by netrex »

From what I've heard it's about the same on old games (pre Doom 3 and HL2), but on D3 and HL2 it's way faster. And it's the best bang for your buck these days I believe.
[color=#DFB257][b]کΛFŦ | netrex[/b][/color] of [url=http://www.saft-clan.net/]S.A.F.T. - The Pride of [color=#FF0000]No[/color]rw[color=#0000FF]ay[/color][/url]
Cool Blue
Posts: 916
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:39 am

Post by Cool Blue »

Well, I picked up the MSI 6600GT. Big difference in the benchmark.

System:

P4 3.1GHz HT
1GB DDR400
845 Chipset


With 9800SE 128MB: 907

With 6600GT 128MB: 2299

I'm pleased. Especially since I resold my 9800SE for $100.

So I upgraded to the 6600 for only $190 after taxes (Canadian). :icon14:
Auburndale
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 8:34 pm

Post by Auburndale »

SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

Memphis wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:6600GT is a lot better.
Is better..

not OMGWTFBBQPWN better.. but is better non the less..

Go with the 6600gt
Bollocks it is

My 6600GT urinates all over my 9800 pro from 12 storeys up

Funny, i had a 9800pro, and my friend locally bought a 6600gt.. and guess what, it wasent that much nicer.. hell i got better frames in HL2, and a few other games..

in fact, the ONLY game that he was like OMGPWN in was doom3..

And our machines, are near identical.. same mobo, ram, hds, cd drives, dvd drives, ect.. only thing is he has a 3.0 and i have a 2.8..
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Duhard »

The BFG GeForce 6600 GT OC is the best GeForce 6600 GT money can buy...

[lvlshot]http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/nvidia_geforce_6600_gt_agp_roundup/images/01.jpg[/lvlshot]

...you heard it here first.

Image
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

Duhard wrote:The BFG GeForce 6600 GT OC is the best GeForce 6600 GT money can buy...

[lvlshot]http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/nvidia_geforce_6600_gt_agp_roundup/images/01.jpg[/lvlshot]

...you heard it here first.

Image
No shit.. :rolleyes:
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Duhard »

SOAPboy wrote:No shit.. :rolleyes:
No shit what you fucking moron?
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

Duhard wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:No shit.. :rolleyes:
No shit what you fucking moron?
The OC cards are almost always better..
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Duhard »

SOAPboy wrote:The OC cards are almost always better..
Yeah they are but the GeForce 6600 GT in the graphs aren't overclocked and they still rape ATI...any questions?

Image
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Duhard »

The GeForce is more cpu dependant than the ATI though...
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

Duhard wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:The OC cards are almost always better..
Yeah they are but the GeForce 6600 GT in the graphs aren't overclocked and they still rape ATI...any questions?

Image
Thats not Rape noob.. :icon29:

Benchmarks should be taken with a grain of salt..
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

I agree with SOAPboy, benchies are nice, but should be taken with a grain of salt.
I do love all my BFG Tech cards and I think a BFG Tech 6600GT OC would be a better choice then a 9800 Pro.

I find it odd that the 6600GT takes such a hit going from 3.0 to 2.8, seems quite odd. I also find it odd that the 9800 Pro with a 3.0 scores 117.2 and the 3.2 scores a 117 and the 3.4 scores a 116.9. I am looking at the HL2 chart
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

Cool Blue wrote:Well, I picked up the MSI 6600GT. Big difference in the benchmark.

System:

P4 3.1GHz HT
1GB DDR400
845 Chipset


With 9800SE 128MB: 907

With 6600GT 128MB: 2299

I'm pleased. Especially since I resold my 9800SE for $100.

So I upgraded to the 6600 for only $190 after taxes (Canadian). :icon14:
Well no shit it's faster than a 9800SE. SE = Shit Edition
It's not even comperable to a 9800 Pro.
Cool Blue
Posts: 916
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:39 am

Post by Cool Blue »

Which is why I <i>upgraded</i> ace.
Post Reply