Doombrain wrote:Since I have your attention soap. This new mobo I’m getting is SATA and I only have two ATA133 HDs. Will it come with some sort of adapter, or will I have to buy a new HD? And what about my DVD burner and other CD drives? Fucking PCs, load of shite.
itll have IDE on the board.. so dont worry
Cheers :icon25:
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.
It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.
I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Doombrain wrote:I'm paying no more than £22. Is it as cheap as that.
Like I said, I use Macs more now.
lol fair enough
Thats very fuckin cheap...
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
I'm thinking about selling my Canon 75-300 USM and getting this
AF 28-300mm XR Di LD Aspherical Macro IF f3.5-6.3
From what i've seen it's 'almost' as good as some of Canons L range
As good as the Canon L lenses LOL!
I wouldn't go with that, I prefer primes, unless its telephoto. IMO keep your 75-300mm, it's ok if that's all you can afford, othewise sell it and get a Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 or a Sigma 100-300mm f/4 (depending if u want 200mm or 300mm but losing light) OR get a Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 THAT IS A FUCKING SICK LENS! But it's a bit more expensive.
I didn’t say better; I said almost as good as some on the lens. I’ve used almost every lens Canon has to offer so I think I know what I’m talking about.
Na. My 75-300 sucks. I'm getting prime 50mm 1.4 USM and was going to get an 'L' but when I tried them at a trade show I just couldn't justify it, yet. I knew you were going to say Sigma though, nice lenses but I believe the Tarmon 28-300 is slightly better.