Would be cool if…If Raw can do it…

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:07 pm

If we could see the icon of the last replying/posting member
instead of just the name.
Understand what I mean?
I am not an IT but I thing it would be fairly easy to do…No?
Pete

Post by **brisk** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:13 pm

Thats the worst idea ever.

Post by **AmIdYfReAk** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:13 pm

i would tend to agree, Especally for all of the dialup people.. having to download the icon's ( Small virsions of it ) at the front page?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:36 pm

So You wouldn't mind having just your name/pseudo instead of your icon embedded with it at the beginnig of your reply/post?
Pete

Post by **seremtan** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:37 pm

not to mention all the people like pete himself who use generic icons

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:41 pm

seremtan wrote:not to mention all the people like pete himself who use generic icons

That is a good point my friend and from this we should all have our own.
It would be more practical to see and screen what we want...No offense to anyone but just like to see right away who is replying or who is here.
Pete

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:42 pm

AmIdYfReAk wrote:i would tend to agree, Especally for all of the dialup people.. having to download the icon's ( Small virsions of it ) at the front page?

people still have dial up ? wtf ?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:51 pm

[FTF]Pyro wrote:
AmIdYfReAk wrote:i would tend to agree, Especally for all of the dialup people.. having to download the icon's ( Small virsions of it ) at the front page?
people still have dial up ? wtf ?

Man, until you mentionned it ( the remark about dial up )
I was wondering what he was talking about. I thought it was a kind of an IT thing.

I was on a dial up for two years at the beginning with a PC 166MMX with 32 MB ram...I use to have plenty of magazines or books that I could read in between downloads. Can't believe I went trought it.
Pete

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:56 pm

pete go snort some beano pills - your brain seems to have a farting problem

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:56 pm

pete wrote:
Man, until you mentionned it ( the remark about dial up )
I was wondering what he was talking about. I thought it was a kind of an IT thing.

I was on a dial up for two years at the beginning with a PC 166MMX with 32 MB ram...I use to have plenty of magazines or books that I could read in between downloads. Can't believe I went trought it.
Pete

I remember that too, specifically waiting for a 40 meg demo version of Q3A to download so that I could see what the difference between that and the released version was...... Apart from the colour of the rail trails and the width of them there was nothing...... yeah it wasnt worth the 4 hour download......

Post by **MKJ** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:57 pm

go away

Post by **brisk** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:58 pm

Its not the bandwidth which is the main problem anyway. Icons at the end of each thread would just look untidy. Simple and minimal is key.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:02 pm

[FTF]Pyro wrote:
pete wrote:
Man, until you mentionned it ( the remark about dial up )
I was wondering what he was talking about. I thought it was a kind of an IT thing.

I was on a dial up for two years at the beginning with a PC 166MMX with 32 MB ram...I use to have plenty of magazines or books that I could read in between downloads. Can't believe I went trought it.
Pete
I remember that too, specifically waiting for a 40 meg demo version of Q3A to download so that I could see what the difference between that and the released version was...... Apart from the colour of the rail trails and the width of them there was nothing...... yeah it wasnt worth the 4 hour download......

And I was on fixed 256 screen until a friend of mine came and saw it and fixed to 16 bits Man I was Happy.
Pete

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:12 pm

pete wrote:

And I was on fixed 256 screen until a friend of mine came and saw it and fixed to 16 bits Man I was Happy.
Pete

Holy mother of christ....... :icon27: :icon25:

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:13 pm

MKJ wrote:go away

You cant be on Dial up d00d....... seriously....... Distance to exchange or not cabled.......

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:53 am

[FTF]Pyro wrote:
pete wrote:

And I was on fixed 256 screen until a friend of mine came and saw it and fixed to 16 bits Man I was Happy.
Pete
Holy mother of christ....... :icon27: :icon25:

Believe it or not. I thought it was normal to see the people pics on the internet as you see them sometimes in gray decoloration almost as comics in the newspapers. For nearly two years I was sitting at my desk as a computer addict with all of this...
Pete

Post by **Nightshade** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:13 am

If pete was on four hits of Orange Sunshine, would he post in a coherent manner?

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:47 am

[xeno]Julios wrote:pete go snort some beano pills - your brain seems to have a farting problem

i thought this was pretty funny :icon33:

Post by **Scourge** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:10 am

[xeno]Julios wrote:
[xeno]Julios wrote:pete go snort some beano pills - your brain seems to have a farting problem
i thought this was pretty funny :icon33:

Eh, soso.

Post by **Canidae** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:24 am

If raw could convert pete into the Q3W websites own annoying little animated paperclip icon guy in the bottom right corner just like in MS word that would be really great.

Post by **bork[e]** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:24 am

tbh, I have all images at q3w blocked. So what icons?

Post by **Scourge** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:27 am

bork[e] wrote:tbh, I have all images at q3w blocked. So what icons?

Personal.

Post by **bork[e]** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:41 am

[lvlshot]http://www.members.cox.net/borke/q3w.jpg[/lvlshot]

sexah.

Post by **Scourge** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:48 am

Doesn't look much different for me.

[lvlshot]http://members.cox.net/jwivie3/q3w.JPG[/lvlshot]

Post by **Tsakali_** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:13 am

Canidae wrote:

:icon32: