PC MAG reviews Quake 4..

Locked
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

PC MAG reviews Quake 4..

Post by Duhard »

and gives it a perfect rating of 5/5...jellus?

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1872452,00.asp

crushed..
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Duhard »

Well looks like I was right when I told ya Chuck Osborn is a gigantic moronoid..everybody gives it a rating of 80+% yet the first moron to review it gave it a 70%...attention whore anyone?

I'm gonna pay the pc gamer forums a visit tonight..
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

played it yet?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Icon of Sin
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Icon of Sin »

Duhard wrote:Well looks like I was right when I told ya Chuck Osborn is a gigantic moronoid..everybody gives it a rating of 80+% yet the first moron to review it gave it a 70%...attention whore anyone?

I'm gonna pay the pc gamer forums a visit tonight..
Cant blame you, game is way better then what those fucktards said... PC lamer... :icon29:
Jenny
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:08 pm

Post by Jenny »

the worst thing is.. the 70% review was the very first review, if it had been 95% then no other review would have dared to drop below 85%.
Icon of Sin
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Icon of Sin »

Jenny wrote:the worst thing is.. the 70% review was the very first review, if it had been 95% then no other review would have dared to drop below 85%.
I totally agree with that.
Locked