"Candy Ass" Gamers article mentions Quake 4

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
-Cp
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:46 am

"Candy Ass" Gamers article mentions Quake 4

Post by -Cp »

Heh..

Thought this was an entertaining read that I'm in full agreement with - there are too many candy-ass gamers out there:

http://www.gdhardware.com/ed/gaming_cyn ... ss/001.htm
SmokeyTreats
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:26 pm

Post by SmokeyTreats »

Candyass!
Sounds like something that should be a compliment to me.

"Come lick me sweet sweet bum for I have a delicious candyass!" :icon25:
[img]http://m0jojoj0.homestead.com/files/avatar/smiley_joint.gif[/img]
User avatar
Survivor
Posts: 4202
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Survivor »

Kinda interesting and i agree to some level but the article is brought like a rant and only that.
SmokeyTreats
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:26 pm

Post by SmokeyTreats »

Funny top 20.

"You might be a Candy-Ass FPS Gamer if…"

1. You hear the word float – the first thing that comes to your mind is a sniper scope.

2. You think that "strategic gameplay" means you sit in one spot and camp for longer than 60 seconds.

3. You’ve never done a rocket-jump.

4. You’re waiting with baited breath for (enter name of next-gen console here).

5. You’ve never been to a LAN party.

6. You’re stoked about the news of an XBOX 360 controller for the PC.

7. Your idea of practice is spending two hours surfing the net for an aim hack.

8. You refuse to install that "Punkbuster" thingy because you’re worried it might block Kazaa.

9. You’ve never been invited to join a clan.

10. You’re too young to vote in an election but you’ve demanded a gameplay patch from a developer.

11. You’ve spent less than fifty hours playing a multiplayer title and have decided it’s “not fair” and everyone else is “cheating”.

12. You refuse to use any weapon that carries less than 500 rounds, has a rate of fire below 300 rounds per minute, or doesn’t utilize “splash damage”.

13. You have never memorized a map or the locations of weapons and power-ups.

14. You’ve never competed in an online tournament.

15. You don’t have time to hone your skills because your geometry homework is overdue.

16. Your only knowledge of World War II is via cutscenes.

17. You’ve never hammered on your keyboard and then kept playing.

18. You minimize your game more than three times per match to type a message in Xfire, ICQ or AIM.

19. You’ve never figured out what the point of that “frisbee gun” is in Unreal Tournament.

20. You’d rather spray paint your logo on the wall than spray your opponents all over the wall.

21. (For Thresh) If you think Xfire is the name of a Chrysler product!
[img]http://m0jojoj0.homestead.com/files/avatar/smiley_joint.gif[/img]
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Satisfying that I don't fit any of those.

There are a few things that dont make sense in that article, not least of which is the underlying message that 'realism' and 'pure' games can't coexist (why not?)... but the overall message is fresh (for a posted article).
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Guest

Post by Guest »

Yes foo, that guy is a fucking idiot though. Whats the deal with him flaming all the people who "can't vote yet" and are not "old enough to drive"? Didn't Cooller win the Q3 championship at 16?
-Cp
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:46 am

Post by -Cp »

ToxicBug wrote:Yes foo, that guy is a fucking idiot though. Whats the deal with him flaming all the people who "can't vote yet" and are not "old enough to drive"? Didn't Cooller win the Q3 championship at 16?
After you're old enough to vote you'll know what he's referring to.. :P
Guest

Post by Guest »

-Cp wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:Yes foo, that guy is a fucking idiot though. Whats the deal with him flaming all the people who "can't vote yet" and are not "old enough to drive"? Didn't Cooller win the Q3 championship at 16?
After you're old enough to vote you'll know what he's referring to.. :P
I'm old enough to vote :dork:
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19175
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Eraser »

Foo wrote:Satisfying that I don't fit any of those.

There are a few things that dont make sense in that article, not least of which is the underlying message that 'realism' and 'pure' games can't coexist (why not?)... but the overall message is fresh (for a posted article).
It's true that most, if not all, "realistic" games are poorly balanced and have luck weighing in much heavier as an influential factor than in a game like Quake, simply because it's relatively easy to kill someone in few shots. Additionally, many of those realistic games have nonsense like instant-kill headshots. Headshots are IMO the most stupid thing ever invented. I bet that at least 50% of all headshots were accidental. This is especially the case in games (again almost all of them) where even automatic rifles can make headshots.

Ofcourse, realism and "pure" games can probably coexist, but it's true that in general, the pursuit for realism does take away a lot from the gameplay itself.
Deathshroud
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm

Post by Deathshroud »

Yea, that article was almost spot on about the realistic games. Games like BF2 and such, at least, have some element of teamwork and strategy within map control, and utilizing vehicles.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

the list is sort of funny, but that guy seems like an asshole. should've stuck to his topic a bit more instead of wandering off into slagging off realism-style games. it's not like those games don't suffer with exactly the same sort of problems.
-Cp
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:46 am

Post by -Cp »

4days wrote:the list is sort of funny, but that guy seems like an asshole. should've stuck to his topic a bit more instead of wandering off into slagging off realism-style games. it's not like those games don't suffer with exactly the same sort of problems.
Which "Guy" seems like that? The byline says it was written by the staff...
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

-Cp wrote:Which "Guy" seems like that? The byline says it was written by the staff...
then one of these people seems like an asshole:
Managing Editor:
Duane Pemberton

News Editors:
Sean "Redwood" Martin
Jeramy Fishel

Senior Editor:
Pete Shove

Reviewer:
Bill Stevenson

Contributing Editors:
Sean Montgomery
Joel Durham Jr.
Cliff Hicks
Kevin Rice
Magnus Laursen
:dork:
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

It's that ratbastard Cliff Hicks, i tell you.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

I really can't say that I agree with much in that article. He does have a couple of valid points, but most of it is just whining.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mrd »

Funny stuff.com
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

Ryoki wrote:It's that ratbastard Cliff Hicks, i tell you.
he really does have a supervillains name, indeed
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

I'm of very similar opinion to the author of that article. I knew it was a sad day when CPL announced counterstrike to be the official game...

i must admit - i haven't played any fps other than quake - maybe 2 hours of unreal/cstrike combined in my life, but i saw enough to know that quake has a massively higher skill barrier than cstrike.
Post Reply