Hello all,
What seems to be the difference between having 'set' instead of 'seta' before a console command?
I tried them both and they seem to do the same thing. Thanks in advance.
The difference between SET and SETA?
In Q3, 'seta' is usually used for main config settings (binds, graphics etc. ) and 'set' is used for scripts because scripts don't need to be archived (config files with the scripts are loaded every time you startup Q3 when you use autoexec.cfg). Q3 doesn't archive variables you declare with set; only cvars you declare with seta are archived or when you changed them in the console.
I don't know Q4 if archives everything, could be...
I don't know Q4 if archives everything, could be...
Nice.xchaser wrote:set sets a cvar
seta sets a cvar and flags it as archive
sets sets a cvar and flags it as server info
sett sets a cvar and flags it as tool
setu sets a cvar and flags it as user info
What is the end product of these, though.
I'm guessing 'seta' makes the cvar get written into the .cfg file. sets makes it get sent to the master server/sent in query. setu and t.... I dunno
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
― Terry A. Davis
I am not a nerd its a easy copy and paste from upset chaps:
http://ucguides.savagehelp.com/Quake4/fullcmdlist.htm
LOL 
http://ucguides.savagehelp.com/Quake4/fullcmdlist.htm


|-----|