Multiple portals within the viewing area...

Discussion for Level editing, modeling, programming, or any of the other technical aspects of Quake
Post Reply
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Multiple portals within the viewing area...

Post by Foo »

I can't seem to get a pair of portals working. I've got 4 teleporters on the level I'm working on (2 pairs of 2) and 2 of the teleporters can be seen at once (but they're not facing each other).

What happens is the top teleporter shows the view which should be seen from the bottom teleporter... but offset. It's very odd.

Anyone come across this problem before? I'm going to try moving the teleporters out of view of each other and hope it'll fix it.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Re: Multiple portals within the viewing area...

Post by ^misantropia^ »

Foo wrote:Anyone come across this problem before?
Yep. It's an engine bug with no real workaround for it (as far as I'm aware).
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Okie thanks.

Mis.. while you're here... regarding the Q3 source.. you're likely to know what's currently being 'done' with it?

I know about the src project over at icculus (although I'm very interested in a compiled build as all I can see are source packages...) but aside from that project everything seems very quiet. At least from the perspective of a player.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Post by ^misantropia^ »

There's not that much going on, I'm afraid. A few (minor) mods are considering going standalone, a handful of people are working on their own (mostly SP) projects, and that's about it.

Regarding icculus.org: I'd put up compiled binaries for you but, since I'm a Linux-only user, that's rather difficult (cross-compiling to Windows is a major pain). Maybe AnthonyJ or corncobman would be so kind to release a binary every once in a while?
User avatar
Hipshot
Posts: 1548
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Hipshot »

I'm sad to say, well atleast I think, that Q3 never will spawn as many engine mods as Q1 did, I'm most sure of it.
Q3Map2 2516 -> http://www.zfight.com/misc/files/q3/q3map_2.5.16_win32_x86.zip
Q3Map2 FS_20g -> http://www.zfight.com/misc/files/q3/q3map2_fs_20g.rar
GtkRadiant 140 -> http://www.zfight.com/misc/files/q3/GtkRadiantSetup-1.4.0-Q3RTCWET.exe
Lukin
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Lukin »

Methinks Q3 will spawn more engines than Q2 did.
Just wait, when Q4 hype will go down many people will go back to Q3 - to modding, mapping, etc.
[size=75][url=http://www.lukinonline.com]lukinonline.com[/url][/size]
User avatar
Hipshot
Posts: 1548
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Hipshot »

Yea more than Q2, but not Q1. I think, that the better and more advanced the core engine is, the less people feels like changing it and adding things. Just adding colored light and cube mapped skies was a big step for Q1.
Q3Map2 2516 -> http://www.zfight.com/misc/files/q3/q3map_2.5.16_win32_x86.zip
Q3Map2 FS_20g -> http://www.zfight.com/misc/files/q3/q3map2_fs_20g.rar
GtkRadiant 140 -> http://www.zfight.com/misc/files/q3/GtkRadiantSetup-1.4.0-Q3RTCWET.exe
Post Reply