.NET Framework/Authenticode

Post by **DRuM** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:50 am

Hello everyone, it is me again

I've not noticed this before and I'm pretty sure they've
been added recently. They're right above the
active X parameters.

In internet options/security settings, there's
> .NET Framework reliant components.
> Run components not signed with Authenticode
( set to disable).
> Run components signed with Authenticode
( set to enable).

That's the settings I found. Should I set enable,
prompt or disable to either?
I don't know what net framework/authenticode is.
How would they have suddenly appeared?

Post by **Tormentius** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:59 am

Just leave 'em, those settings are fine.

Post by **DRuM** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:02 am

Ok, thanks again Mr.T! :lub:

Post by **Tormentius** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:03 am

DRuM wrote:Ok, thanks again Mr.T! :lub:

You're welcome.

Post by **Oeloe** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:30 pm

I was moderated for acting like an ignorant prick

Post by **axbaby** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:37 pm

i may be wrong but doesn't ATI drivers sometimes require NET Framework to be installed

Post by **Doombrain** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:39 pm

Oeloe wrote:I was moderated for acting like an ignorant prick

you're at it again. if you don't like helping, don't post.

Post by **dzjepp** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:17 pm

axbaby wrote:i may be wrong but doesn't ATI drivers sometimes require NET Framework to be installed

Yep, the catalyst control center version does indeed require .net framework installed.

Post by **DRuM** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:54 pm

Ah, that'll be it then, I recently installed the latest cats with control center.

Post by **axbaby** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:14 pm

i am teh win?

Post by **DRuM** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:44 pm

axbaby wrote:i am teh win?

I believe you are.

Austhentifcoude active x

Post by **prince1000** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:11 pm

not to derail but isn't the CCC a huge resource hog?

Post by **Tormentius** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:27 pm

Oeloe wrote: I was moderated for acting like an ignorant prick

This is your last warning Oeloe. If you don't want to help then fine but the comments are pathetic. This is a tech forum and we're here to help people out not point them to a search engine without any guidance.

Post by **Tormentius** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:28 pm

prince1000 wrote:not to derail but isn't the CCC a huge resource hog?

Yes, it is. I usually recommend using the stock ones without the control centre.

Post by **Oeloe** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:33 am

Oeloe wrote:I was moderated for acting like an ignorant prick

Well excuse me :icon28: but the idea of asking about something you don't have the faintest idea of what it is/does without spending 10 seconds in a search bot to get a general idea is beyond me. It's not uncommon at all in forums that question posers are expected to show at least SOME initiative to inform themselves before they start asking questions. If that's not the case here, then put up a T&T policy sticky.

Post by **Oeloe** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:16 am

Tormentius wrote:Yes, it is. I usually recommend using the stock ones without the control centre.

ATi Tray Tools is a great substitute for the CCC and has more features. Omegadrivers (very recommendable drivers) includes ATT too.[/off-topic]

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:19 am

Oeloe wrote:
Oeloe wrote:I was moderated for acting like an ignorant prick
Well excuse me :icon28: but the idea of asking about something you don't have the faintest idea of what it is/does without spending 10 seconds in a search bot to get a general idea is beyond me. It's not uncommon at all in forums that question posers are expected to show at least SOME initiative to inform themselves before they start asking questions. If that's not the case here, then put up a T&T policy sticky.

How about you just respect people who have been posting here a lot longer than you have therefore have built up a healthy persona with other long time posters. If you don't like it I’m sure you can find another good forum to post in here.

Post by **DRuM** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:16 pm

Thanks doombrain for your support

Oeloe, I got nothing against you man, it's all cool. I did sort of briefly look it up on google beforehand, but I like posting in T&T ( which isn't THAT often) because questions can often lead to other little tidbits that might not show up on google.
Plus ax and I can insult each other ( in the nicest possible way of course )

Post by **axbaby** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:40 pm

i like you despite your face.

if everyone used google i'd be out of a
job here and i'd be back to doing dishes.

it had never bothered me answering a question that google couldn't answer.

i guess all my answers from now on could be > Google but if a question is asked we might as well answer it or point them to a link that helps.

relax Oeloe and have some coffee

Post by **Tormentius** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:34 pm

Oeloe wrote:
Oeloe wrote:I was moderated for acting like an ignorant prick
Well excuse me :icon28: but the idea of asking about something you don't have the faintest idea of what it is/does without spending 10 seconds in a search bot to get a general idea is beyond me. It's not uncommon at all in forums that question posers are expected to show at least SOME initiative to inform themselves before they start asking questions. If that's not the case here, then put up a T&T policy sticky.

I'm not going to spell out in a policy that we're not here to repeat "search Google" ad infinitum in a tech support forum. Doombrain summed up the situation quite well but we would like to see you stick around and help out, so let's drop it and move on.