Why has no one mentioned this shooting?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

tnf wrote:
Jackal wrote:Also it should be considered that the passengers had all already been screened. The chances the guy actually had a bomb were rather nil.
Also, one could say that, prior to the planes being hijacked, the odds of some arab guys with little boxcutters causing a couple wars was rather nil....

just saying that hindsight is always 20/20...but when you are in the heat of the moment situation that may be life or death for many people, sometimes you're forced to act in a manner that minimizes risk for the maximum # of people. I doubt the protocol that the air marhsalls follow when someone on the plane says they have a bomb is to think to themselves "he's already been screened...so there really isn't much to worry about."
For a smart guy that's the stupidest thing I think I've ever heard you say. Someone was shot and killed for making a threat. The whole thing reeks of paranoia to me.
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

Jackal wrote:
tnf wrote:
Jackal wrote:Also it should be considered that the passengers had all already been screened. The chances the guy actually had a bomb were rather nil.
Also, one could say that, prior to the planes being hijacked, the odds of some arab guys with little boxcutters causing a couple wars was rather nil....

just saying that hindsight is always 20/20...but when you are in the heat of the moment situation that may be life or death for many people, sometimes you're forced to act in a manner that minimizes risk for the maximum # of people. I doubt the protocol that the air marhsalls follow when someone on the plane says they have a bomb is to think to themselves "he's already been screened...so there really isn't much to worry about."
For a smart guy that's the stupidest thing I think I've ever heard you say. Someone was shot and killed for making a threat. The whole thing reeks of paranoia to me.
That's what happens, though. If someone is confronted by cops, says he has a gun, and starts reaching into his coat, he's going to get shot, too.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Just curious here Jackal, what would you have done?
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

Nightshade wrote:Just curious here Jackal, what would you have done?
I would have kicked the guy's head in.
Apparently the guy just wanted off the plane/entry way. He kept telling one of the airport staff he needed off and when they wouldn't immediately let him go he said he had a bomb. At least that's what they just said on the news.
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

Actually I have no idea what I would have done. I havn't been trained for that sort of thing and I don't think a person could pay me to even touch a gun. If you threw Jackal the research analyst in the situation I would have fucking ran.
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

and likely would have been shot too.

"That man is running in the airport! HE'S A TERRORIST!!!"
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Lol, felonious running. "WE THOUGHT HE HAD SCISSORS!"

I ask because I myself don't know what I would have done, I can only speculate. That's all any of us can do, because we weren't there. I can see reasons why they would have shot him, but if they were close enough to restrain him and could see his hands, then I would suggest that perhaps the shooting was not necessary.
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

I see where you're coming from. I just think if the marshall would have been thinking rationally he would have realized shooting the man was extreme.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

He probably did realize that it was extreme, but I can only assume that he was absolutely convinced that the guy had a bomb. Then again, I've heard some negative things about the quality of the people that have become air marshals recently, so anything's possible.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Jackal wrote:
tnf wrote:
Jackal wrote:Also it should be considered that the passengers had all already been screened. The chances the guy actually had a bomb were rather nil.
Also, one could say that, prior to the planes being hijacked, the odds of some arab guys with little boxcutters causing a couple wars was rather nil....

just saying that hindsight is always 20/20...but when you are in the heat of the moment situation that may be life or death for many people, sometimes you're forced to act in a manner that minimizes risk for the maximum # of people. I doubt the protocol that the air marhsalls follow when someone on the plane says they have a bomb is to think to themselves "he's already been screened...so there really isn't much to worry about."
For a smart guy that's the stupidest thing I think I've ever heard you say. Someone was shot and killed for making a threat. The whole thing reeks of paranoia to me.
Someone shot and killed for making a threat happens all over the place I'd guess. So then, praytell, when should the shooting take place - AFTER THE THREAT IS CARRIED OUT? The luxury of waiting to see if it is a fake threat or not isn't something that an air marshall always has.

You say you have a bomb, and then you run away from the air marshalls who are trying to stop you, towards other people who, as far as they know, you may be planning to blow up...
hmm...what to do on that one?
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

And if the guy HAD blown himself and others up we'd all be sitting here saying "damn, why didn't they take him out when they had the chance...?"
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

Well hell, it's not as bad as the london subway shooting. Not by a long chalk.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Geebs wrote:Well hell, it's not as bad as the london subway shooting. Not by a long chalk.
hey, nobody cares about that, ok.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

fucking airport culture :icon33:
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

i dunno - i'm hearing reports (from other thread) that he never claimed to have a bomb...
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

He wanted out of the entry point to the plane and freaked out. There was a guard directly next to him as well.
farad
Posts: 588
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2000 8:00 am

Post by farad »

[xeno]Julios wrote:i dunno - i'm hearing reports (from other thread) that he never claimed to have a bomb...
...no you didn't ....you're just starting shit again...


...you fucking mango... >:E
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

Image

bite me
farad
Posts: 588
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2000 8:00 am

Post by farad »

...you make me hot...
SiCdeth
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2000 7:00 am

Post by SiCdeth »

I just recently started a job at JFK airport and I will just say that airport security does kinda suck. Now I'm not an expert on the technology that they use or how flawed it is or secure it is or whatever but it just 'seems' like it isn't as good as it should be.

As for shooting the guy, who gives a shit? He should know better than to fuckin say he has a god damn bomb on board no matter how bad he wants to get off the fucking plane. Death is a little extreme, but that's America for you, right?
Post Reply