solid proof we never went to the moon...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

solid proof we never went to the moon...

Post by Freakaloin »

no such thing as fire or sparks in space...the moon has no atmosphere...thus no flames eh...

well what the fuck is that when the lander takes off?

told...any questions?

http://www.tntleague.com/misc/lem.rm
Dekard
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Dekard »

Dumbass
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

Some people will beleive anything so they can make threads on a forum
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

please explain how hydrocarbons can burn like that in space and i won't call u a fucking fagot...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

What if youdo call me a fagot what then
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

Those NASA scientists thought they could fool the general population, but it looks like internet forums are having the last laugh.
[size=85]yea i've too been kind of thinking about maybe a new sig but sort of haven't come to quite a decision yet[/size]
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

mjrpes wrote:Those NASA scientists thought they could fool the general population, but it looks like internet forums are having the last laugh.
and 35 years after the fact too


WE NEVAR FOT WARLD WOR ONE IT WAZ A HOXE!!!!!!111!! MY INTARDNET FORUM CAN PROOV IT!!
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

andyman wrote:What if youdo call me a fagot what then
then from that point on ur officially a fag0t...any more questions?
capriker
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:51 am

Post by capriker »

Are you speaking of the white flecks that fly out as the module seperates from the lander? Those are debris flying off as the two pieces seperated, not sparks.

Also, as the rocket engine took off, it expels gas to propel the module doesn't it? This gas could account for sparks, as could dust and other matter.

Plus, if I remember, many things in space 'burn' with no atmosphere. All you need are the raw elements or fuel, i.e. the Sun.

Of course I could be wrong...
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

Freakaloin wrote:
andyman wrote:What if youdo call me a fagot what then
then from that point on ur officially a fag0t...any more questions?
I have a whole internet forum with a video to boot that says that you calling me a fagot was a hoax, and that ignorance = stupidity

trice
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

interesting...but u r now a fag0t...sry...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
redfella
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 7:00 am

Post by redfella »

:puke:
black & white blanket logic
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

Freakaloin
Insane Quaker

Image

Joined: 07 May 2002
Posts: 490
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

i heard there is solid proof that geoff is a moron. any confirmation avialable on the net?
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

You aren't serious about this, right? Who says sparks and flames can't exist in space? If you have materials that don't require oxygen to burn, you'll get flames (although it may be difficult to keep the temperature hot enough for a prolonged burn). And sparks are just pieces of hot debris that glow. Thus, blasting off from the moon would produce 1) flames from the fuel in the thrusters, which burn just fine, and 2) hot debris particles that will glow as they're thrown from the launch pad.
:dork:
redfella
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 7:00 am

Post by redfella »

If someone was to seriously debate that the landing on the moon never happened, then that person would also have to be able to state why all responsible parties would want to make it a hoax. The principles of logic strongly favor that we did indeed land on the moon 35 years ago.
black & white blanket logic
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

Every argument I have seen about the moon landing is easy to disprove with a little research.

#1 research tool

lol
the mancubus
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 11:40 pm

Post by the mancubus »

The luner modules all carried an oxidizer together with the propelent so that it could effectively burn and produce thrust!

The "sparks" you refer to is the gold leaf protective foil being blasted off. This is wrapped around the bottom half of the module (the part that is left behind on the moon) and is used to help insulate and protect the equipment from the 250 degree celcius heat from the sun.
Post Reply