Screenshots

Post by **wviperw** » Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:18 pm

pjw wrote:
wviperw wrote:pjw: Is that 2nd shot real?
Yep. As voodoochopsticks said, it was a freak occurance, but the shot is indeed real/non-photoshopped.

Wow I completely missed those posts above, lol. Are there more shots of it anywhere?

Post by **pjw** » Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:46 pm

GIS for "mammatus".

Post by **cha0s** » Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:24 pm

small and fast q4 tourney:
[lvlshot]http://www.chaosquake.de/files/images/cq4dm1.jpg[/lvlshot]

Post by **Geit** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:57 am

And a butt load of screenshots

The first three are of a CTF map that is in a very early stage of development:
[lvlshot]http://goat.gamepoint.net/pics/geit4ctf2b13-1.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://goat.gamepoint.net/pics/geit4ctf2b13-2.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://goat.gamepoint.net/pics/geit4ctf2b13-3.jpg[/lvlshot]

And the next four are of a tourney map. There's no detail (mostly decals) yet. Mainly just hull and lighting.
[lvlshot]http://goat.gamepoint.net/pics/geit4dm2b43-1.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://goat.gamepoint.net/pics/geit4dm2b43-2.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://goat.gamepoint.net/pics/geit4dm2b43-3.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://goat.gamepoint.net/pics/geit4dm2b43-4.jpg[/lvlshot]

Post by **wviperw** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:52 am

Looking good you guys.

Geit: How many maps are you working on at the same time now, something like 17?

Post by **Geit** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:07 am

wviperw wrote:Looking good you guys.

Geit: How many maps are you working on at the same time now, something like 17?

No, 4

Post by **evillair** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:11 am

Looks great Geit & cha0s
Hipshot, that sky is sweet

Nice job

Post by **o'dium** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:47 am

Geit that would look good if it wasn't for that rock texture. Can you not ditch it for a better one?

Post by **MegaMan44** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:22 pm

geit, way too bight for my liking. and you will probably get in d3engine hell also

Post by **Lukin** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:55 pm

cha0s >> Nice choose of colors. Looks very promising.
Geit >> the rock texture looks fine for me. However the lighting could be better - more colors and/or more contrast could make it great.

Post by **Oeloe** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:44 pm

Lukin wrote:cha0s >> Nice choose of colors. Looks very promising.

Agreed.

Post by **Fjoggs** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:00 pm

Q3 ain't dead.

Me and Black_Dog's WIP creation:

Post by **Hipshot** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:32 pm

Slick!

Post by **Geit** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:36 pm

MegaMan44 wrote:geit, way too bight for my liking. and you will probably get in d3engine hell also

I'll tone the lighting down a bit then

Although the lighting is still far from finished.
And erm, d3engine hell?

Post by **wviperw** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:55 pm

Fjoggs: Wow, that is quite sekseh! I thought it was Q4 at first. From looking at the screenshots, the only thing I'd definitely change would be the foilage up top in the first screenshot. It doesn't look so good.

Post by **Black_Dog** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:40 am

I should be contributing more to that map.

Post by **Foo** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:28 am

I actually got off my ass and did a bit more on this next beta of Foo3DM4. It's not as graphically 'rich' as I'll be shooting for in the final, but I'm concentrating on putting out a second beta over this weekend if feasible.

Post by **Hellfog** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:44 am

Looking forward to trying it out.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:53 am

Foo, from the screens I'd lose the red and blue...or at least make them a lot more subtle. Maybe instead of red and blue use yellow and/or whites? I think it'll look better with the metal textures you have.

Post by **Foo** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:57 am

The saturation is way too strong atm.
I've got some nice electric blue stuff to add in which'll replace the existing blue, and the reds will become a lot less pronounced when I get some natural light in there and tone it down.

Next beta will be re-testing the layout now I've switched a load of stuff around and added basic detail crap in.

Post by **sumatra** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:08 pm

Foo wrote:The saturation is way too strong atm.
I've got some nice electric blue stuff to add in which'll replace the existing blue, and the reds will become a lot less pronounced when I get some natural light in there and tone it down.

Next beta will be re-testing the layout now I've switched a load of stuff around and added basic detail crap in.

Change the red into a warm orange tone and I'll be fine.
I'm looking forward to check the new version out. I like the layout of the alpha.

Post by **Hipshot** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 12:42 am

LDR vs HDR sky. My new env map.
[lvlshot]http://developer.valvesoftware.com/w/images/b/b5/Ldrvshdr.jpg[/lvlshot]

Post by **wviperw** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 12:52 am

LDR looks better. HDR is washing way too many of the details.

Post by **AEon** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:14 am

Agree, prefer LDR as well. Any HDR should probably be left to game engines to keep things consistent i.e. dynamic like in Half-Life 2.

Post by **Hipshot** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:28 am

Anyway, when I first looked at the sky, the LDR of course was right for me alsom, since you see more, but in the other hand, there is a more warm feeling with the HDR that makes me like it more. It's really a taste thing, because, I don't need the HDR (in game) to have the sky like that, I could just beef the exposuer in HDRShop (not the same think I know, still)

HDR, before BSPzipped in Source, uses alot of space. Actually I HDR developed level uses alot more MB.

AEon wrote:Agree, prefer LDR as well. Any HDR should probably be left to game engines to keep things consistent i.e. dynamic like in Half-Life 2.

Who said this pic wasen't from HL2? ;)