Are the SATA 3.0 Gb/sec drives compatible with older MBs that support SATA? I've got an ASUS A7N8X (pretty early revision) and I need a new HD. I'll have to double check when I get home, but I think it supports SATA onboard.
What's the current best value size? Most Gb/$. I'm thinking of staying cheap, $100 - $120, but if the price per GB is much better a size or 2 up, I'll go that route.
tia
edit: loooking online, I'm thinking my MB can only support ATA133, not SATA.
buying a new HD
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
The 200GB ATA-133 Seagate Barracuda's are a good and cost effective drive.
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... re=Seagate
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... re=Seagate
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
I'm thinking of getting this one:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822144236
Is there really a performance difference between 8 and 16 MB caches?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822144236
Is there really a performance difference between 8 and 16 MB caches?
-
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am
I can't say for certain, but I would think that the doubled cache would be a very nice thing to have. Also the MaxLine III series was developed for enterprises and has a million hour MTBF, which is very nice. I truly like Mator and that is a good hard drive at a good price.
As for the 128GB thing, I honestly don't know what Windows deal is, I installed Windows on a 200GB hard drive and don't recall if the installation had SP1 or not, but it worked. It was a Maxtor 200GB that I am still using right now.
As for the 128GB thing, I honestly don't know what Windows deal is, I installed Windows on a 200GB hard drive and don't recall if the installation had SP1 or not, but it worked. It was a Maxtor 200GB that I am still using right now.
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
Fender, hope you don't mind me hijacking this thread a bit, but I'm also shopping for a new HD.
I'm thinking of getting one of these, 250GB 7200.9 8MB 11MS SATA2 NCQ RoHS:
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... omoid=1046
Odd thing, the 7800.8 reports a 8MS, yet the 7800.9 is supposedly faster but is 11MS. Wondering if that's a large issue? Any other suggestions?
I'm thinking of getting one of these, 250GB 7200.9 8MB 11MS SATA2 NCQ RoHS:
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... omoid=1046
Odd thing, the 7800.8 reports a 8MS, yet the 7800.9 is supposedly faster but is 11MS. Wondering if that's a large issue? Any other suggestions?
Last edited by obsidian on Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
When used as in low I/O near offline storage solution. When used as a normal drive the MTBF is probably on par with regular drives. But the 5 year warranty for $2 more is nice, regardless.Kills On Site wrote:Also the MaxLine III series was developed for enterprises and has a million hour MTBF, which is very nice.