q3tourney2 Remake

Post by **Rufus** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:45 pm

I'm doing a q3tourney2 remake from scratch. Wanted to know if any of you here thinks it's worth continuing.

Here's some screenshots of progress so far...

[lvlshot]http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/RPearce/Quake4/shot00001.jpg[/lvlshot] [lvlshot]http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/RPearce/Quake4/shot00003.jpg[/lvlshot]

Post by **jester!** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:52 pm

Sure why not. :icon32:

Post by **CrinklyArse** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:57 pm

Go for it :icon14:

Post by **StormShadow** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:06 pm

might want to add an ambient light or something, its looking quite dark..

but sure, remake away

Post by **Robcq** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:34 pm

Get this sucker out for beta testing as oon as posiible

Post by **jayP.lq** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:17 am

I have to say Q3 remakes just dont hold my interest.

I think the Q4 physics are unique enough to warrent a different approach to mapping than Q3. Ramp jumps and crouch sliding are what give Q4 is unique feel. Q3 maps dont take those features into consideration because Q3 physics are different.

We have alot of potential for some great maps with the new movement, teleporter and jump pad physics.

Why waste all that fun stuff on a Q3 remake?

Post by **jester!** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:07 am

Gotta disagree, the dm6 remake does play differently, but it plays well from a structural point of view and the Q4 physics add to it.

Post by **Duhard** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:11 am

q3dm13 would be perfect..

Post by **jester!** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:41 am

Always liked dm13. :icon14:

Post by **Absolut** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:03 am

jayP.lq wrote:I have to say Q3 remakes just dont hold my interest.

I think the Q4 physics are unique enough to warrent a different approach to mapping than Q3. Ramp jumps and crouch sliding are what give Q4 is unique feel. Q3 maps dont take those features into consideration because Q3 physics are different.

We have alot of potential for some great maps with the new movement, teleporter and jump pad physics.

Why waste all that fun stuff on a Q3 remake?

I couldn't agree more. I don't see anything wrong with one or two q3 map remakes (or any Quake for that matter) but lets get some nice maps specifically for q4. If I want to play q3 maps i'll fire up q3. To me it's like enough is enough...how many q3 maps do we want in q4? Can we concentate on making some good q4 maps?

Post by **Foo** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:16 am

By we you mean other people right?

make the maps you want, because that's what everyone else is doing.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:26 am

I'm an idiot...

Post by **Bueller** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:24 am

Regardless of the map you make, leave a damn link or we won't be able to play it. :-) Thx Raven.

q3tourney2 Remake

Do you want to see this project completed?

q3tourney2 Remake