North Korea will bolster its nuclear weapons.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:39 pm

polls taken in the past few years unimously say the us and israel r the biggest threat to world peace...and if u look around there is evidence of this occuring at this very moment...look for the body parts...

Post by **inphlict** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:41 pm

Freakaloin wrote:and for that matter zarqawi has been dead almost as long as bin laden(who died in december 2001)

If he's dead why has he been releasing tapes for the past couple of years, which clearly state recent events.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:42 pm

Freakaloin wrote:polls taken in the past few years unimously say the us and israel r the biggest threat to world peace...and if u look around there is evidence of this occuring at this very moment...look for the body parts...

YOU GOT ONE RIGHT!

Post by **losCHUNK** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:48 pm

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:chunk, why are you trying to reason with geoof?

its geoff ?

shit, i retract everything ive said

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:48 pm

inphlict wrote: If he's dead why has he been releasing tapes for the past couple of years, which clearly state recent events

[/quote]
wait...u mean those tapes we never hear that r released on some obscure islamic website? there is just as much of a chance those web sites are run my the cia. all those kidnappings....prolly cia as well to scare away journalist and to have excuses to kill ppl. like falluja...3 days before that relief worker woman was kill or kidnapped with a video released...note all iraqis and known so-called terror groups denied it...

i know there are mulitple videos where the terrorists are wearing rings...well anyone who knows anything about radical islam knows wearing a ring is blasphemy...uh okay...

Post by **werldhed** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:51 pm

Freakaloin wrote:no dude i'm not joking and it is a fact...maybe if u didn't give all ur info from the corporate media u would know this. but its common knowledge with intellectuals, intelligent service and ppl in the know...

al queda was a name created by washington...there are no sleeper cells...never have been and everyone knows it...u wanna dispute it dumbo?

I'm not going to pretend to be an expert, but I'm calling BS on this part of Geoff's rhetoric.
Noam Chomsky does not believe there is no al-Qaeda or bin Laden.

Freakaloin wrote:and find out what intellectuals like noam chomsky r saying...and if u think noam is wrong then ur just a moron...thx...

So you basically just called yourself a moron. Oops.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm

wrong...

Post by **inphlict** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:55 pm

Bah I didn't know it was Geoff no point in arguing or explaining anything.

Post by **werldhed** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:57 pm

Prove me wrong. He makes numerous references to al-Qaeda and bin Laden as well as things bin Laden says (i.e., he quotes him) in many of his recent articles. Sorry.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:57 pm

inphlict wrote:Bah I didn't know it was Geoff no point in arguing or explaining anything.

dumb ass can't hang...typical loser debate tactic...run in fear...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:01 pm

If Al Qaeda doesn't exist,

EXPLAIN PAULY!

Post by **Oblivi0.on** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:02 pm

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:04 pm

werldhed wrote:Prove me wrong. He makes numerous references to al-Qaeda and bin Laden as well as things bin Laden says (i.e., he quotes him) in many of his recent articles. Sorry.

bin laden is real...the word al-qaeda is real...i have heard him say bush and bin laden r a team...what do u think he meant by that.anyways...al-qaeda is a world view in reality...thats why noam talks of it...

Post by **werldhed** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:18 pm

Freakaloin wrote:bin laden is real...the word al-qaeda is real...i have heard him say bush and bin laden r a team...what do u think he meant by that.anyways...al-qaeda is a world view in reality...thats why noam talks of it...

I'll give you that, if it is true. But he doesn't just refer to al Qaeda as a worldview. He has mentioned the increase in al Qaeda "recruitment," and implied that it was an active body that physically drafts new members.

He also refers to bin Laden as a "murderous thug" who is "still at large" (quoted from two separate articles). Sounds to me like he thinks Osama is, indeed, a terrorist.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:20 pm

Yeah that guy's a fucking lunatic.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:26 pm

like i said u say alqade now it just means ppl who want westerners out of the middle east and will fight. look...osama is a terrorist (was), there was a grioup of ppl based in afghan who trained terrorists and carried out terror attacks. they could be called al-qaeda i guess...but that organiaztion has been destroyed...broken up...now alquada is a world view...not a real threat...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:27 pm

oh and the still large is the official position...unless he has read something noam won't just assume...he backs his shit up with facts...

Post by **werldhed** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:39 pm

I can agree with that, but even if I didn't, I wouldn't argue it because I don't know if al Qaeda is still around nor do I care. It just seemed that you were saying there never was an al Qaeda nor bin Laden, and I was saying your boy Chomsky disagrees.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:40 pm

no...i said bin laden died in 2001...al-qaeda is a myth...

Post by **Ryoki** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:11 pm

Freakaloin wrote:...now alquada is a world view...not a real threat...

Haha!
That makes it much more of a threat.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:21 pm

no it doesn't...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:22 pm

the threat is building up becuz we keep killing muslims...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:48 pm

CRSUHED.....

next....

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:36 am

Oh hi geoff. :icon30: didn't recognize you there for a couple seconds.

Post by **7zark7** » Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:44 am

2 words... preemptive strike.