Debating with you is like repeatedly smashing your face into a solid block of granite... painfully fucking fruitless and not worth the effort.
Man Ticketed For Changing Red Lights To Green
That must be why Nightshade has no counter-argument for the point I've put forward to him several times in this thread, and why I destroyed your pathetic argument in my Atheist thread with so much ease, to which you had no reply and made the excuse of running out batteries in your keyboard and never posted in the thread again.Ryoki wrote:All your replies in this thread have been supporting Nightshade's point
Debating with you is like repeatedly smashing your face into a solid block of granite... painfully fucking fruitless and not worth the effort.
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Yeah I know, he's been at q3w for too long, he hasn't learnt any new tricks in 6 years of posting rubbish here.Law wrote:Careful, he will now mention your age, profession, living quarters and supposed mental state, accompanied by a laughing icon.... for the ten millionth time.DRuM wrote:God, nightshade is such a fat, ugly, bald, clueless retard
Yep, I reckon so. But he's unlikely to get the air hostess position he wanted so badly in case he tells all the passengers to sit down, put their fucking seat belts on and to stfu. Plus I doubt he'd fit into a jumbo jet, he's so fucking obese.Law wrote:Maybe Boeing will give him a job if he tells them he's spent the last six years being an internet flame warrior.
another thread destined to the cess pit that is R&R ?
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Oh, i know you'd get some kind of pseudo intellectual orgasm if i adressed that, spent time looking for arguments to counter your bullshit and make another pointless troll in the atheist thread, but i refer to my granite comparison and disgress.Law wrote:That must be why Nightshade has no counter-argument for the point I've put forward to him several times in this thread, and why I destroyed your pathetic argument in my Atheist thread with so much ease, to which you had no reply and made the excuse of running out batteries in your keyboard and never posted in the thread again.
PS drum, you'd be dangerously depressing if you weren't so outrageously pathetic
Yet your technique is so easily refuted. If you weren't so eager to troll you may have been able to think before you typed, rendering your argument something more than it's current state of uselessness.Ryoki wrote:Oh, i know you'd get some kind of pseudo intellectual orgasm if i adressed that, spent time looking for arguments to counter your bullshit and make another pointless troll in the atheist thread, but i refer to my granite comparison and disgress.Law wrote:That must be why Nightshade has no counter-argument for the point I've put forward to him several times in this thread, and why I destroyed your pathetic argument in my Atheist thread with so much ease, to which you had no reply and made the excuse of running out batteries in your keyboard and never posted in the thread again.
PS drum, you'd be dangerously depressing if you weren't so outrageously pathetic
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
-
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
You're still ignoring the things I've stated, in rather plain English, but I'll address this stupidity.Law wrote:Still no counter-argument from Nightshade.Law wrote:Where is your rebuttal to my easily countered argument that three years of law school combined with three years of practice as a solicitor provides the skills of a competent barrister, Princess Panda?
You seem to think that attending school makes you a great attorney? Is that why the phone books are full of ambulance chaser listings?
And you're ASSUMING you'll get a job.
Here's your chance to prove your brilliant skills. Support your argument that I'll not be offered a job by Boeing. Specifically reference where I'm deficient in the requirements for the job of Control Systems Engineer. Should be a snap for you, I'd assume.
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Actually I'm having fun breaking the Law, DrUMB's just such a pathetic old cunt that he has to start trying to troll me like the emotionally wounded, 50 year-old, queen of the crying cunts that he is. I didn't realize that I'd destroyed him so completely, kind of makes me feel bad.busetibi wrote:another thread destined to the cess pit that is R&R ?
I've easily answered every point you've made, in plain English. I'm pointing out that your theory, after reading some posts on the internet, that I will not be able to practice competently as a Barrister is nothing short of retarded, and this is easily argued by the fact that three years of Law School combined with three years of practicing as a solicitor is more than enough to provide one with the skills of competency. This is a logical argument which completely overwhelms your childish assumptions. I wouldn't have a clue if you'll get a job with Boeing or not, I simply copy/pasted your comment to me about practicing Law to highlight its ridiculousness. Yet, just as you claim I am in regards to being a Barrister, you are doing nothing more than assuming you will get a job.Nightshade wrote:You're still ignoring the things I've stated, in rather plain English, but I'll address this stupidity.Law wrote:Still no counter-argument from Nightshade.Law wrote:Where is your rebuttal to my easily countered argument that three years of law school combined with three years of practice as a solicitor provides the skills of a competent barrister, Princess Panda?
You seem to think that attending school makes you a great attorney? Is that why the phone books are full of ambulance chaser listings?
And you're ASSUMING you'll get a job.
Here's your chance to prove your brilliant skills. Support your argument that I'll not be offered a job by Boeing. Specifically reference where I'm deficient in the requirements for the job of Control Systems Engineer. Should be a snap for you, I'd assume.
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Yeah it looks like they put a site link in their image, it's i-hacked... thats what the sign says to there...losCHUNK wrote:heh, the sign on the right in one of them pics looks like it says 'hacked'DooMer wrote:dude got ripped off http://www.i-hacked.com/content/view/176/44/
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/astr0chimp][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/astr0chimp.jpg[/img][/url]
::[url=http://www.astrochimp.net]astrochimp dot net[/url]::
::[url=http://www.astrochimp.net]astrochimp dot net[/url]::
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
So what you really mean is:"Nightshade, I have no ability to refute your arguments, so I'll just rehash all the crap I've already spewed and prove absolutely nothing again. Then I'll ignore your challenge and engage in forced inter-laughter with my e*buddy DrUMB, because he's a fucking idiot, too."Law wrote:I've easily answered every point you've made, in plain English. I'm pointing out that your theory, after reading some posts on the internet, that I will not be able to practice competently as a Barrister is nothing short of retarded, and this is easily argued by the fact that three years of Law School combined with three years of practicing as a solicitor is more than enough to provide one with the skills of competency. This is a logical argument which completely overwhelms your childish assumptions. I wouldn't have a clue if you'll get a job with Boeing or not, I simply copy/pasted your comment to me about practicing Law to highlight its ridiculousness. Yet, just as you claim I am in regards to being a Barrister, you are doing nothing more than assuming you will get a job.Nightshade wrote:You're still ignoring the things I've stated, in rather plain English, but I'll address this stupidity.Law wrote: Still no counter-argument from Nightshade.
You seem to think that attending school makes you a great attorney? Is that why the phone books are full of ambulance chaser listings?
And you're ASSUMING you'll get a job.
Here's your chance to prove your brilliant skills. Support your argument that I'll not be offered a job by Boeing. Specifically reference where I'm deficient in the requirements for the job of Control Systems Engineer. Should be a snap for you, I'd assume.
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am


