now you owe it to your lolling peers to spill the beansDave wrote:Jesus F. Christ, was that so hard? Now that I know who you are, I don't know why you were banned so I will let you come back. Next time don't be so full of yourself.
:E
now you owe it to your lolling peers to spill the beansDave wrote:Jesus F. Christ, was that so hard? Now that I know who you are, I don't know why you were banned so I will let you come back. Next time don't be so full of yourself.
this man speaks the true story.R00k wrote:Why are people jumping on Dave here? We've had posters do some malicious, childish shit to these boards - I'd ban an alt too, if he didn't want to reveal who he was. :icon27:
Not this one but close.PJS wrote:You bought yours for 120$. How good of condition was yours in?pete wrote:Exactly what I bought at the time. That's a non frequent word that you can remember. It says that every family had a few of them at the time to protect them from malicious... To protect them.Dek wrote:Looks to me like a Ushabti... covered those in a half hour presentation this past semester..
http://www.usc.edu/dept/LAS/wsrp/educat ... abti.shtml
you can read versions of the book of the dead online, I have it in hard back book as well, with reasonable congruence between online and hard copy. Interesting read, not a top 10 seller though.pete wrote:
Initially, these magical figures were believed to act as a substitute for the deceased himself, although later they came to be regarded as mere servants in the afterlife. Hence, at first they were sometimes fashioned either as mummies or as living persons dressed in fine linen garb, but in later periods their appearance changed more to that of servants. A spell for this purpose appeared in the Middle Kingdom Coffin Texts and from the New Kingdom the figures were inscribed with Chapter six of the Book of the Dead
mjrpes: Thanks for the welcome. What do I know about you lol? Well nothing really. But I've been seeing your name here and reading your posts since I've been coming here. What I meant when I said I knew who most of you are was simply that I have been posting alongside a lot of you since January of 2003. That doesn't mean I personally know anyone here, just aquaintances with my stupid alts, really.PJS
Nice art relic you have there!
Ushabti (shawabti) figurines and scarabs are the most
common ancient Egyptian artifacts and were manufactured
in the millions. They come in a wide variety of designs
and are easy enough to come by quite legally on the
antiquities market and yours very well could be authentic
although the probability of its recent manufacture for
the tourist trade cannot be ruled out.
Depending on how long ago it was aquired a reputable
antiquities seller, like Sadigh in NYC, might have
included a certificate of authenticity with it as
well as the "item code" stamped on the box.
To find out more about your ushabti I suggest you
present two more pictures of it. One facing forward
and one with it turned slightly to the side opposite
of the pic you posted here. Make sure the hieroglyphics
are plainly visible and clear. You will want to get
three - five independent translations. The cartouche
probably gives the ushabti's original owner's name.
I can make out the "Ra" and "M" glyphs but the other
glyphs below the "M" in the cartouche are indistinct
although it looks like it could be one of the seated
man or seated neter glyphs. I'd rather not hazard a
guess but if what I make out is correct the name
could be one of the 19th dynasty rulers.
Good luck in finding out more about the provenance
of your art piece. Here's one similar to it.
![]()