PHOTOS PLEASE

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

wow. leftfield. look forward to meeting you in newport sometime. you can express your views to me face to face.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Guest

Post by Guest »

Dave wrote:I think doombrain's photos are pretty :lub:
I think the camera makes them pretty but the photos themselves are uninteresting.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

you can't win them all, that's the whole fucking point
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Memphis wrote:
Doombrain wrote: na, it's nothing man. He's just prolly finished drinking all the beer in wales, because he drinks, incase you didn't know :)
I haven't drank in over 8 months :)

Incase you didn't know
yeah, i've made a real point in following you're personal life.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

why?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Guest

Post by Guest »

Memphis wrote:Lol anyway. Nice to see who's got the defensive streak here when they're not even the topic of conversation. Or was that the problem from the beginning?.
I noticed it, only reason I started saying I thought the pics were crap to begin with :olo:
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

I'll think you'll find anyone defensive when they are dealing with total pricks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Guest

Post by Guest »

Memphis wrote:You dare side with me AssKrac :icon6:

I dig alone
Nah dude just using the opportunity as I saw it arise.
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

what? what does close-up shots being a fad have to do with expensive cameras?
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Memphis wrote:Why do you ask?
Because you said so, retard.

Anyway here are pics of crazy Italians (They played against Ghana in my city tonight):

clicky
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Memphis wrote:There's enough people out there snapping any old shit with a decent cam and calling it gold.
What's your problem anyway?
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Memphis wrote:That's a very open question.

Please be more specific.
Why are you shitting on this thread?

Wait, I don't care. Just fuck off, alright?


Edit: Nice stealth edit
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Memphis wrote:I didn't shit on this thread at all. I'm trying to encourage some more inventive work from some people who claim to have a passion in the subject. Now if people can't take constructive criticism from their target audience then the problem is far from being mine...
No, you were being a dick.
Memphis wrote:What's a 'stealth edit' anyway? It blatently says 'edited by Memphis'.

Are you trying to accuse underhand tactics on me now? Does that mean you think you've lost too?
What the hell are you on about?
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Mephis is right. Tight focused shots on dull shit are about on par with grayscaled pics and myspace self-shoots which show the camera.

Which I only realised as I thought about comparably tacky shots, are the other photos in your post.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

This saturday, DJ Tiesto performed at the river here in Rotterdam for 200.000 people, because of the arrival of the Volvo Ocean Race boats.

(shutter at 1/8, f5.3, ISO 1600 (oh the noise), night)

[lvlshot]http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/49/d5007912mv.jpg[/lvlshot]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Foo wrote:Mephis is right. Tight focused shots on dull shit are about on par with grayscaled pics and myspace self-shoots which show the camera.

Which I only realised as I thought about comparably tacky shots, are the other photos in your post.
:icon23: :icon22:
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

SplishSplash wrote:
Foo wrote:Mephis is right. Tight focused shots on dull shit are about on par with grayscaled pics and myspace self-shoots which show the camera.

Which I only realised as I thought about comparably tacky shots, are the other photos in your post.
:icon23: :icon22:
I STILL LOVE YOU LIKE THE SLICKBACK GERMAN BROTHER I NEVER HAD
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Memphis wrote:
SplishSplash wrote: No, you were being a dick.
Explain how.
Look, if we all gathered here under the title "Up and Coming Photography Prodigies" you might have a point.

But as long as we're just posting pics for fun, with things like
SplishSplash wrote:As you can probably tell, it hasn't been that long since I discovered the manual focus on my camera. :icon32:
written right underneath it, it's pretty obvious nobody needs your patronizing bullshit.
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

MORE Photos, LESS banter

My gf's niece
[lvlshot]http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/2600/d5009541um.jpg[/lvlshot]
Guest

Post by Guest »

I envy you, you take great pics. Went through the posts reading it diagonally and saw some fuck you and a dick But I payed more attention to the pics so that's OK.
Great thread Doombrain. Btw, are you still with this wonderfull woman you posted here last year? I hope so .
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Memphis wrote: So? You admit you're a new starter in the wonderful world of still imagery (twice). So why is bit of criticism so hard to take?
Because you were being a dick about it. It's not like you made some startling new revelation by saying "Stones are boring." You were simply being a dick.

And for the record, I don't know how you ever got into my target audience, but as of now, you're officially out.
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Post by brisk »

lol
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]You might as well have complained about the Mona Lisa right after Michelangelo painted the first two strokes of his brush.[/quote]
Guest

Post by Guest »

Memphis wrote:
pete wrote:I envy you, you take great pics. Went through the posts reading it diagonally and saw some fuck you and a dick But I payed more attention to the pics so that's OK.
Great thread Doombrain. Btw, are you still with this wonderfull woman you posted here last year? I hope so .
See? pete's still your friend! :icon25:
Thanks Memph, but who thought I wasn't?
Guest

Post by Guest »

Memphis... the man that pisses off the internet. Good one memph, you've topped me today.
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

lol, drama queens
Post Reply