Yes it would start the boot process (which is what i meant by sequence, I did not mean the boot order) and then Windows would look for a driver for the device and it would fail to find secondary master. Why you think checking the jumpers is a horrible idea and will do nothing? After all we do not have a ton of facts and the jumper could, not is, but could be a culprit as where you say that there is no chance in hell that the jumper could cause this issue. So before you go jumping on my ass I would like to see a suggestion from you.Oblivi0.on wrote:ok, lets take your "assumption" here. if the hdd was primary master, and dvd burner was secondary master, how would taking the sec master out affect anything with the primary master?Kills On Site wrote:He was vauge. I assumed his HDD was Master Primary IDE and his DVD burner was Master Secondary IDE and CD Drive was Slave Secondary IDE. That would make most sence, and is what HP did with my HP, not to mention that one of the devices must be on a different IDE channel from the other two.Oblivi0.on wrote:also, even if he removed a device do you think that little jumper on the back of the previous master device (hard disk) deviced to magically jump to the slave postion. try to think next time ffs.
it would still be master. it would still be primary. it would still be the first boot option. so not s fucking thing has changed in the boot sequence.
PC doesn't start up correctly! WHELP!!! WHELP PLEASE!!!1111
-
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
-
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
No KoS, that wouldn't make a difference.Kills On Site wrote: Yes it would start the boot process (which is what i meant by sequence, I did not mean the boot order) and then Windows would look for a driver for the device and it would fail to find secondary master.
I'd suggest reading up on the boot sequence and XP's startup sequence a bit more. If you guys want to debate this further start a thread for it.
then you havent worked on some serious boneheads computers..Tormentius wrote:Really? I have never seen or heard of an "install flipping out" over a jumper setting. If a jumper setting is wrong the issue normally occurs before the OS loads.
trust me, ive see some retarded shit, and a OS flipping out and not booting fully due to a jumper on a cd drive is one of them..
-
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:00 am
oh mystical goth. please read the inital post. the user took out thew cdrom drive...so even if he took out the pins and chewed on them it wouldnt affect the bootup, because its not in the pc. bam.SOAPboy wrote:trust me, ive see some retarded shit, and a OS flipping out and not booting fully due to a jumper on a cd drive is one of them..Tormentius wrote:Really? I have never seen or heard of an "install flipping out" over a jumper setting. If a jumper setting is wrong the issue normally occurs before the OS loads.