Wow repeating my post. How original.Law wrote:Don't be mad at me because you can't handle the information that is in front of you at the moment.scourge34 wrote:Don't be mad at me because you can only handle the information that is in front of you at the moment.
oh my gawd
That's not an issue for me as it's not possible for my replies to be useless or redundant. Much as it's not an issue for you - all your replies are useless and redundant.scourge34 wrote:And missed out on any subsequent post that might make your reply useless or redundant. Good job.Law wrote:Then you had to go back, check out the general position on page, general length of post, check out whether there's quotes or not (and of course read it for the second time) for each and every post you wish to reply to, when you could have simply just hit the quote button upon the first reading.
Jeez, you can't even follow a chain of events. Sad.Law wrote:You see scourge this is what happens when you randomly click about the page and don't really know which post you're replying to. You end up making no sense and looking like a moron.scourge34 wrote:That you're an ugly mong? Yeah I know.Law wrote:No need, I already know it's true.
Now come on scourge, you admit to reading the threads several times over before you can even muster up a reply, now you want me to go back and start rereading the thread for you as well? lol, sorry Randy, you'll just have to struggle with what a spastic you are on your own. 
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Really? show me where I said that.Law wrote:Now come on scourge, you admit to reading the threads several times over before you can even muster up a reply, now you want me to go back and start rereading the thread for you as well? lol, sorry Randy, you'll just have to struggle with what a spastic you are on your own.