predictions: upcoming U.S. congressional elections

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Have you read up on him?
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

nope
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Might be worth a read.
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

dems are going to win the house it appears...but allen will win and keep the republicans in control of the senate...will be interesting to see if there are any prosecutions for voter fraud after allen's supporters called a dems and told them their polling places had been moved.
GlobalExtacy
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:57 am

Re: predictions: upcoming U.S. congressional elections

Post by GlobalExtacy »

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:okay in this thread post who you think will 'win'
a) in the senate
b) in the house of representatives

My predictions:

b) republicans by 3 seats and Lieberpimp wins too.

Despite exit polling data which will indicate a democratic victory, the republican party's famous get out the vote apparatus will snatch victory from defeat. (in other words i think it's gonna be rigged)
ownT :icon23:

edit:

Also, this guy is gone now, thank god:

(skip to 2:55 for Hostettler) http://youtube.com/watch?v=mj8YuWhVv1g
Cory
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:17 pm

Post by Cory »

It looks like democrats are winning both the house and senate according to CNN.com predictions.

They will hold a majority in the house and the senate will remain balanced.

And it looks like The Terminator will still be Californias governor, by a decent margin.

What is with California and voting for republican governors and democrat presidents.
Last edited by Cory on Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

dems are up by 15 in the house now according to CBS :)
Cory
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:17 pm

Post by Cory »

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/bop/

Democrats gained a lot of ground this election, lets see how the presidential election goes.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

i am happy right now :)
Cory
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:17 pm

Post by Cory »

Looks like the abortion proposition passed in Cali, girls can no longer recieve abortions until their parents are notified.

Time for girls to start falling down stairs and using coat hangers again imho.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Cory wrote:Looks like the abortion proposition passed in Cali, girls can no longer recieve abortions until their parents are notified.

Time for girls to start falling down stairs and using coat hangers again imho.
Or stop getting knocked up. But of course, realisitically, that's never going to happen 100%...I've had 5 pregnant students in 4 years at my current school...kids are going to do what kids are going to do.

I'm pro-choice in most circumstances, although I don't really like abortions as a form of birth control after the fact because someone couldn't keep their pants on. That being the case, I don't see the big deal about requiring parent notification for minors to get an abortion. FFS, minors pretty much need a parent with them to sign off on anything, major surgery, etc. I don't see the HUGE deal about requiring doctors to make kids under 18 notify their parents about abortions.

The coat hanger argument is a big stretch in the case of this specific piece of legislation.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

NO MORE RICK FUCKING SANTORUM.
yaya.
-Replicant-
Posts: 1004
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 8:00 am

Post by -Replicant- »

I hope Webb can pull off some random victory over Allen, otherwise the senate will stay with the repubs

good for the dems for all the gov and house spots
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

-Replicant- wrote:I hope Webb can pull off some random victory over Allen, otherwise the senate will stay with the repubs

good for the dems for all the gov and house spots
it's amazing how close that race is. 2.3 million votes cast and they are less than 3 thousand votes apart.
iluvquake4
Posts: 941
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:47 am

Post by iluvquake4 »

It's too bad voting leads to jury duty. I would have voted otherwise.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

lol
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

theoneandonly wrote:I voted against Arnold. Oh well.
me too. even though Angelides comes off as a bit of a slimeball, i have relatives who have worked under him and say that he's a pretty good guy.
iluvquake4
Posts: 941
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:47 am

Post by iluvquake4 »

Fox News = Reporters on the brink of tears.

CNN = Reporters having orgasms.

:dork:
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

I'd vote for Arnold and Jesse... And I don't vote.
Cory
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:17 pm

Post by Cory »

tnf wrote:
Cory wrote:Looks like the abortion proposition passed in Cali, girls can no longer recieve abortions until their parents are notified.

Time for girls to start falling down stairs and using coat hangers again imho.
Or stop getting knocked up. But of course, realisitically, that's never going to happen 100%...I've had 5 pregnant students in 4 years at my current school...kids are going to do what kids are going to do.

I'm pro-choice in most circumstances, although I don't really like abortions as a form of birth control after the fact because someone couldn't keep their pants on. That being the case, I don't see the big deal about requiring parent notification for minors to get an abortion. FFS, minors pretty much need a parent with them to sign off on anything, major surgery, etc. I don't see the HUGE deal about requiring doctors to make kids under 18 notify their parents about abortions.

The coat hanger argument is a big stretch in the case of this specific piece of legislation.
I agree with you, this piece of legislation is a lot better than the last time it came around where it required parental consent, this just requires parental notification.

Maybe i did stretch it a tad ;)
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Doesn't sound too outrageous does it, but I question whether parents ought to have the right to force their child to carry a pregnancy to term. If the fetus could be removed from the child and incubated in an artificial womb then I would seriously reconsider that position (probably in favor of compulsory parental consent up to age 17 or so, only if they agreed to the artificial womb condition should the minor object).

Otherwise compulsory parental notification sounds right.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

No, Ford lost. Unfortunately as it turns out, since at this point it looks like the GOP has 49 Senate seats and Dems have 48.

I don't know what you've read about him but I haven't read it. I have read plenty about his other family members, just not much about Ford himself.

Pretty shitty that I felt I had to vote for a guy I knew next to nothing about. Just love that 2-party system.


At any rate, looks like there are still 3 Senate seats up for grabs. Here's hoping the Dems can take two of them, but I have my doubts.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

after the recount and court battles, the dems will control the senate too. i can't believe it. :icon25:
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

What recount and court battles?


And my fellow citizens voted by an overwhelming majority to amend the state constitution to limit marriage to heterosexual relationships. Fucking bible belt. The really sad part is, that could very well be the only reason some people even voted. :icon27:
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

R00k wrote:What recount and court battles?


And my fellow citizens voted by an overwhelming majority to amend the state constitution to limit marriage to heterosexual relationships. Fucking bible belt. The really sad part is, that could very well be the only reason some people even voted. :icon27:
webb is ahead, but by a margin small enough to entitle Allen to an automatic recount. and that seat will break the tie in the senate (so expect court battles)
Post Reply