i thought D3 sucked because the SP was pants. same with Q4. plus i wasn't impressed with the game engineshaft wrote:Everyone thought D3 sucked becasue the MP wasnt like Q3, same with Q4...everyone just wanted Q3 all over again...more of the same.
Call of duty 3
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
-
79DieselRabbit
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:00 am
Because Gray Matter was folded into Treyarch, which does console-only development, we had 5 platforms to make it on, 2 of them old-gen, and less than a year of solid development time to do it in. IW had 2+ years for 2 platforms and neither of them had the limitations of the PS2.iluvquake4 wrote:Did they give any reason for not making a PC version?
Thats why. Because a PC TITLE IS SLATED ALREADY FROM INFINITY WARD.reefsurfer wrote:umm..yea Cpt. obvious.. he dident ask that, he asked why CoD 3 dident come to pc.. not who is making the next cod.SOAPboy wrote:
Infinity Ward didnt make it. There working on a PC title.. Guess thats the word on the street anyways.
Back to bowling you fucking idiot.
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.
It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.
I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.
I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
You must hang out on Pasty Nerd Street.SOAPboy wrote:Guess thats the word on the street anyways.reefsurfer wrote:Not that i know... guess pc is so last year?iluvquake4 wrote:Did they give any reason for not making a PC version?
Alot of games are coming for the consoles firts/or exclusive... why is beyond my knowledge.
All i know is that im drooling for gears and vegas.
-
AmIdYfReAk
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
Yea, he does, and i do to... Got beef?Nightshade wrote:You must hang out on Pasty Nerd Street.SOAPboy wrote:Guess thats the word on the street anyways.reefsurfer wrote: Not that i know... guess pc is so last year?
Alot of games are coming for the consoles firts/or exclusive... why is beyond my knowledge.
All i know is that im drooling for gears and vegas.
*trys to look for the "Street Brawlin, CUNT" pic*
Damnit!
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
How many players does CoD3 online support on the PS2?
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
eepberries
- Posts: 1975
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:14 pm
Let me guess... You never played wit hthe PS2 online, have you?MKJ wrote:how would it be different from any other console?
Think of playing Quake 3, with a 700ping, and then your half way there.
And thats on the decent servers.
And thats once you get into a game, after five hours of trying to get it all working.
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Yeah the PS2's online functionality was a let down when compared to the Xbox. Now how about that question I brought up?o'dium wrote:Let me guess... You never played wit hthe PS2 online, have you?
Think of playing Quake 3, with a 700ping, and then your half way there.
And thats on the decent servers.
And thats once you get into a game, after five hours of trying to get it all working.
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
he speaks the truth. it is absolutely pathetic (compared to xblive)o'dium wrote:Let me guess... You never played wit hthe PS2 online, have you?MKJ wrote:how would it be different from any other console?
Think of playing Quake 3, with a 700ping, and then your half way there.
And thats on the decent servers.
And thats once you get into a game, after five hours of trying to get it all working.
I don't care for too many WW2 shooters.
I wish COD2 was a bit more open in the maps - i.e. my guy is some hardcore soldier who can't jump a 2 foot fence? Shit like that bugs me when a game is trying to really immerse you in the action in a slightly more realistic fashion. COD2 just felt a bit on rails in some of the missions, not all. Some of it was great though. Brothers in Arms kind of ruined me for anymore ww2 games...that overhyped piece of crap made you really appreciate good squad AI, because it certainly didn't have it.
How many more WW2 games will there be you think?
I wish COD2 was a bit more open in the maps - i.e. my guy is some hardcore soldier who can't jump a 2 foot fence? Shit like that bugs me when a game is trying to really immerse you in the action in a slightly more realistic fashion. COD2 just felt a bit on rails in some of the missions, not all. Some of it was great though. Brothers in Arms kind of ruined me for anymore ww2 games...that overhyped piece of crap made you really appreciate good squad AI, because it certainly didn't have it.
How many more WW2 games will there be you think?
-
I cant spell u
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:00 am
so COD3 online really fuking sucks ..
single player is reasonably distracting and looks very nice ..
movement is clumsy as hell - maps FULL of sticky points ..
on the whole is usual arcade bs shooter - its just about ok tbh
single player is reasonably distracting and looks very nice ..
movement is clumsy as hell - maps FULL of sticky points ..
on the whole is usual arcade bs shooter - its just about ok tbh
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/no3y3h4nd][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/no3y3h4nd.jpg[/img][/url]
