TFTs then

Locked
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

TFTs then

Post by Foo »

Right. I've got a scratch 2 inches long in me monitor from the i20 LAN party last year. Which sucks. Ample opportunity to upgrade to a flat panel, I tells myself. But wait.. what's that being yodelled from over in yonder adjacent valley? "yoooo knowww notheeeeng abooout flatpanellllsss!". Hans is correct.

Low response rate, slick looks, 17inch minimum, mid-range price (2-300 English Bones). I *think* this is the criteria. Please suggest changes if I'm not seeing the whole picture :D

I've seen this and in principle an 8ms response time makes me shit my pants. Is my excrement justified?


http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductI ... tID=170700
reefsurfer
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am

Post by reefsurfer »

I have a Acer AL1714 with 14ms response and its a beuaty!
I tried two others before i bought that one..both had 25ms response and i tried all three with:
Painkiller
Quake 3 arena
Farcry
Doom 3
Joint ops

no worries at all.. its only the old(a year back?)ones that apperantly cant run fast FPS games.

Buy one man... its rock solid!
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

Dell apparently makes really good flat panel displays.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

I know IBMs flatpanels are shit, both style-wise and image quality.

We buy them in at work, the high end too.. they just stink, IMO.

Will check out dell (though they just rebranded?)
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

Did they? Can't see any mention of it on their website.
4g3nt_Smith
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:00 am

Post by 4g3nt_Smith »

Rebranded LG's I believe, Dell or Apple (or Both). I hear great thinks about Dell displays either way.
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Samsung 710T

enough said.
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

Viewsonic VP171B.

8ms response time. Great reviews. Make sure you get the 8ms version. The same model number is used on the 16ms version.

Most likely, you'll be buying this online. Most tech stores don't carry it.

Too bad you scratched one of your monitors and need to replace it. I'll be selling three pristine Samsung 900IFTs as soon as a 21 inch OLED hits the market.

Edit: Here is a picture of the 16ms version, but they look the same on the outside. Just make sure wherever you buy it from clearly says 8ms on the page.

Image
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

No speakers, minimal screen edge... looks perfect.

Scan don't carry it, so I'll check overclockers and failing that, scrape around on EBuyer (they suck but if it's the only way...).

Cheers rep!
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

I have a Samsung SyncMaster 172x, and it's great. 12ms response time, no ghosting, great interpolation and good colors. Pretty cheap too.

reviews:

http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm? ... 033&page=1

http://graphics.tomshardware.com/displa ... cd-05.html

Image
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dr_Watson »

the dell 2100fp usually cleans ass in every lcd review i've ever read.
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Grudge wrote:I have a Samsung SyncMaster 172x, and it's great. 12ms response time, no ghosting, great interpolation and good colors. Pretty cheap too.

reviews:

http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm? ... 033&page=1

http://graphics.tomshardware.com/displa ... cd-05.html
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... re=Samsung

VS

http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... re=Samsung
prince1000
Posts: 1892
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:00 am

Post by prince1000 »

Dr_Watson wrote:the dell 2100fp usually cleans ass in every lcd review i've ever read.
yeah but it's ugly as shit
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:
Grudge wrote:I have a Samsung SyncMaster 172x, and it's great. 12ms response time, no ghosting, great interpolation and good colors. Pretty cheap too.

reviews:

http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm? ... 033&page=1

http://graphics.tomshardware.com/displa ... cd-05.html
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... re=Samsung

VS

http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... re=Samsung
The 711N is 25ms, so not that good for games. Although the 1000:1 contrast ratio is nice.
Locked