How many people are running vista?
How many people are running vista?
Well? What are your thoughts?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
have a test machine here at work with vista
terrible :icon14:
lots of unneeded visual improvements. and no it doesnt boot in the 2-3 seconds like they said (
).
its XP with a macosx skin, really. and bigger icons. and more wizards.
and more ram usage.
terrible :icon14:
lots of unneeded visual improvements. and no it doesnt boot in the 2-3 seconds like they said (

its XP with a macosx skin, really. and bigger icons. and more wizards.
and more ram usage.
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
I've still got RC1 on my home system, but I'll be getting the full release soon.
I've really liked it so far. Haven't had any real problems with it. It does seem to be a bit of a GPU hog, without having anything excessively visually taxing.
I only notice it when I have tons of windows open, which isn't often.
Oh, and the fact that so many programs aren't supported is a pain, but that's why I dual-boot.
I've really liked it so far. Haven't had any real problems with it. It does seem to be a bit of a GPU hog, without having anything excessively visually taxing.
I only notice it when I have tons of windows open, which isn't often.
Oh, and the fact that so many programs aren't supported is a pain, but that's why I dual-boot.

-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:15 pm
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
I haven't used it but I'm loathe to upgrade just for some bloatware eyecandy.
What are the real benefits over XP? From what I understand they still have some DRM stuff going on but I don't follow that geek stuff enough to care.
I have a 2 year old machine with 2 GB of RAM....will I end up with a choppy machine that won't let me rip porn DVDs or play downloaded porn DVDs?
What are the real benefits over XP? From what I understand they still have some DRM stuff going on but I don't follow that geek stuff enough to care.
I have a 2 year old machine with 2 GB of RAM....will I end up with a choppy machine that won't let me rip porn DVDs or play downloaded porn DVDs?
Been running it on my media center since RC2, I like the new Vista Media Center much better then XP's. Ill be getting it.
Media Center and Aero work flawlessly so far on the integrated 945G chipset. I havent played any games on that pc though, and I dont really intend to. The video was the lowest score of the system at 3.
Media Center and Aero work flawlessly so far on the integrated 945G chipset. I havent played any games on that pc though, and I dont really intend to. The video was the lowest score of the system at 3.
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Carmack opinion:
http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/ ... .15034.htm
Carmack: It’s a tough thing for Microsoft, where, essentially, Windows XP was a just fine operating system. Before that, there were horrible problems with Windows. But once they got there, it did everything an operating system is supposed to do. Nothing is going to help a new game by going to a new operating system. There were some clear wins going from Windows 95 to Windows XP for games, but there really aren’t any for Vista. They’re artificially doing that by tying DX10 so close it, which is really nothing about the OS. It’s a hardware-interface spec. It’s an artificial thing that they’re doing there. They’re really grasping at straws for reasons to upgrade the operating system. I suspect I could run XP for a great many more years without having a problem with it.
http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/ ... .15034.htm
Carmack: It’s a tough thing for Microsoft, where, essentially, Windows XP was a just fine operating system. Before that, there were horrible problems with Windows. But once they got there, it did everything an operating system is supposed to do. Nothing is going to help a new game by going to a new operating system. There were some clear wins going from Windows 95 to Windows XP for games, but there really aren’t any for Vista. They’re artificially doing that by tying DX10 so close it, which is really nothing about the OS. It’s a hardware-interface spec. It’s an artificial thing that they’re doing there. They’re really grasping at straws for reasons to upgrade the operating system. I suspect I could run XP for a great many more years without having a problem with it.
we've got it running on a test machine here and i'd agree with the general concensus - it's alright, nothing special and it uses a lot of resources.
the stuff torm mentioned sounds interesting - does vista run on reasonable hardware now? the machine we had to build to test it is fucking preposterous.
the stuff torm mentioned sounds interesting - does vista run on reasonable hardware now? the machine we had to build to test it is fucking preposterous.