New toy....

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

New toy....

Post by Geebs »

Image
Nice, huh? Got it secondhand for 400 quid, going to use it for gigs. For the guitar nerds, it's the late nineties japanese model.
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Post by Captain »

90s eh? That's before all the shit-smearing started. Cool guitar.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

that's sick.
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by YourGrandpa »

Nice stick.
User avatar
Survivor
Posts: 4202
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Survivor »

Looking slick. :up:
User avatar
Scourge
Posts: 15559
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Scourge »

Had one very similar. Nice choice. :icon14:
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

How much time does your job leave you for practice and gigs geebs? Have you ever had to leave in the middle of a set because you got called into the emergency room for something?
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by YourGrandpa »

He's not really a doctor. He just plays one on the internet.
CrinklyArse
Posts: 5493
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:57 am

Post by CrinklyArse »

Nice. I'm Jealous. :(
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

tnf wrote:How much time does your job leave you for practice and gigs geebs?
It's easy to acommodate, I just sleep 5 hours a night :icon25:

I've just bought a couple of "temol-nos" for this and my old JS-100 which I gave to my singer - should sort out tuning problems at gigs when I get them installed
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Geebs wrote:
tnf wrote:How much time does your job leave you for practice and gigs geebs?
It's easy to acommodate, I just sleep 5 hours a night :icon25:

I've just bought a couple of "temol-nos" for this and my old JS-100 which I gave to my singer - should sort out tuning problems at gigs when I get them installed
I think it would be funny if your pager (do docs even use those anymore?) went off mid-solo or something and you were to come busting into the ER with your guitar still over your shoulder.
User avatar
PhoeniX
Posts: 4067
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2000 7:00 am

Post by PhoeniX »

Looks nice :). I keep thinking about getting a new guitar, I love the Les Paul look but then I wonder if it's actually worth it :p.
Lieutenant Dan
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:25 am

Post by Lieutenant Dan »

That's an awesome looking guitar. :)
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Nice one, I like the bridge/trem system. :icon14:

The Tremol-no's website doesn't have a lot of info on it. I'm curious about it though.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

PhoeniX wrote:Looks nice :). I keep thinking about getting a new guitar, I love the Les Paul look but then I wonder if it's actually worth it :p.
I can't stand to play Les Pauls. They look great, but they're heavy and not balanced very well. They're really awkward to play sitting down, IMO.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mrd »

Cool axe mate. I've never been a super huge fan of Ibanez but they are still great guitars. I always find their necks are too thin and bodies too light.

I just bought myself a $1300 7-string guitar on Saturday, I've been thoroughly enjoying that this weekend :D Now that I have that, I can put my other 6-stringer back into a tuning that's semi-normal so when buds come over to jam I don't have to constantly transpose everything I play up like 5 frets or whatever. :icon32:
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mrd »

R00k wrote:Nice one, I like the bridge/trem system. :icon14:

The Tremol-no's website doesn't have a lot of info on it. I'm curious about it though.
It basically turns a floating bridge into a solid one. I can't recall how it's done, but theres a small metal rod that you have to install I believe.

EDIT: It probably just replaces the springs in the bridge with a solid metal rod.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

It says it lets you switch between modes (dive-bomb only, hard-tail, solid) easily while you're playing.

I just can't figure out how it works from the pics. If it just replaced the springs with a steel rod, then you wouldn't be able to use the tremolo at all would you?
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mrd »

Hmm.. not sure then. I remember reading about how they worked a year or two ago but I'll be damned if I can remember :icon32:

Maybe there's some sort of latch that you can connect/disconnect to engage the springs when needed or something.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Well, it seems more like a bar locks in place, so the trem won't move. But by loosening a couple of thumbscrews, the trem is functional again.

I just can't tell exactly how it installs and works...
Image
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

i'd like to see it installed. i can't see it NOT looking a bit goofy.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mrd »

Check out the demo video... I'd take a screen dump but WMP is a faget and won't let me and I can't be arsed to find some software to do it just for this.

It sits in the back of the bridge with the springs. It looks like the hooky lookin' things on the right in the pic attach to the bridge near the strap peg on the body, and the other piece hooks up on the neck side.

I assume you'd just unscrew one of those knobs and it disengages the whole deal and goes back to your spring setup.

Looks pretty slick to me.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Nah, it goes in the back with the springs:
http://www.guitarristas.info/portal/ind ... &pageid=50

They claim it's tool-free to change back and forth, but I guess you need to play with the back cover off to do that.

Still pretty slick.
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

R00k wrote:
PhoeniX wrote:Looks nice :). I keep thinking about getting a new guitar, I love the Les Paul look but then I wonder if it's actually worth it :p.
I can't stand to play Les Pauls. They look great, but they're heavy and not balanced very well. They're really awkward to play sitting down, IMO.
Im with you on that..

Only exception is a friend had a "new wood" les paul. Oddly played ALOT better than some of the others ive dicked around on.
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

mrd wrote:Cool axe mate. I've never been a super huge fan of Ibanez but they are still great guitars. I always find their necks are too thin and bodies too light.
My experience of gigging is that usually my back's utterly fucked by lugging the PA and drum kit, so the lighter my guitar, the better :icon32:

I agree, the original Wizard neck on the RG and S series is a bit on the thin side (although this one feels a bit fatter than my old RG, that was ridiculous); my main guitar's an Ibanez JS and that feels a lot more "Stratty" - thinner fretwire and more of a radius on the fretboard. The neck on the JS is absolutely perfect, fits the hand comfortably while never getting in the way.
Post Reply