PHOTOS PLEASE

Post by **Dave** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:08 pm

mjrpes wrote:
l0g1c wrote:
Man, I should tell the people at my local lab about this breakthrough technology. :icon7:
It's not really that new

Here's a Nikon scanner with it:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control ... sku=310477

Technically he'll need an 8000 or 9000 since he's doing 120, which will set him back about $2000

Post by **horton** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:22 pm

FanaticX wrote:

Ive walked past hardrock in Ueno, so many times..
Its about 45mins from my house.

Where were the car pics taken? There is a classic car museum in Odaiba, I dont recognise the cars you took as being from there though

Post by **l0g1c** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:32 pm

Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.

Post by **FanaticX** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:37 pm

horton wrote: Ive walked past hardrock in Ueno, so many times..
Its about 45mins from my house.

Where were the car pics taken? There is a classic car museum in Odaiba, I dont recognise the cars you took as being from there though

They were from the Honda Collection Hall at Twin Ring Motegi. A friend of mine used to live 30mins from there.

Post by **saturn** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:59 pm

l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.

I like the atmosphere and lighting, kudos.

Post by **mjrpes** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:03 pm

l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner.

Whose scanner? Did you buy one??

Post by **l0g1c** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:49 pm

mjrpes wrote:
l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner.
Whose scanner? Did you buy one??

I got a CanoScan 8600F
It works well enough for me, since I'm just a hobbyist.

Post by **l0g1c** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:52 pm

saturn wrote:
l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.

I like the atmosphere and lighting, kudos.

Thank you, sir! Means a lot to me since one of your photos has been my desktop at work for ages now (the fall one).

Post by **saturn** » Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:20 pm

Cheers, glad that you liked it. Every new photo you post is improving, so keep it coming :-)

Post by **Doombrain** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:59 pm

I might buy a 1D MKII N

Post by **Dave** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:41 pm

After using both, I prefer the 5D for everything except shooting sports... Even the the 5D has a considerable edge in extreme low light. The 1DMIIN is a better camera in every respect except image quality and low light performance.

Post by **FanaticX** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:40 pm

Doombrain wrote:I might buy a 1D MKII N

Why? What's wrong with your current one?

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:20 pm

i can't take it out in the rain, i live in the UK. today i had to run across a carpark with the camera under my coat. the 8.5fps is also nice.

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:20 pm

plus i'm a sucker for tech.

ps rain

Post by **A1yssa** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:08 pm

Doombrain wrote:
Dave wrote:H

my favourites

Post by **Dave** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:00 pm

Doombrain wrote:plus i'm a sucker for tech.

ps rain

Wait for the rumored new 1D with the 5D sensor and 1V half body... If it's true I'm getting rid of both bodies I have now for that one. Apparently some guy wrote an article about it and had to pull it down for some reason... Usually when that happens it's more than just a rumor. Water resistant and full frame without the full price of a 1DS (which he claims will be 22MP)

Post by **Dave** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:01 pm

A1yssa wrote:
my favourites

danke.. Maybe one day I'll rescan them with a not-so-crappy scanner.

Post by **Dave** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:24 am

Post by **FragaGeddon** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:34 am

She's HOT!

Post by **l0g1c** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:43 am

Huzzah for weird film anomalies and poorly scanned photos.

Apparently, there's a paramecium eating my film.

Post by **Dave** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:49 am

It looks like either fogged film or light leakage on the scanner bed

Post by **Tsakali_** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:51 am

l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.

I want a wallpaper size copy of that :icon14:

Post by **Dave** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:54 am

Since it's MF, you could almost wallpaper an entire wall in your house with that

Post by **l0g1c** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:59 am

Tsakali_ wrote:
l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.

I want a wallpaper size copy of that :icon14:

I'll re-scan it in a higher resolution this weekend and post it. :icon14:

Post by **l0g1c** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:02 am

Dave wrote:It looks like either fogged film or light leakage on the scanner bed

It's on the negative like that. At first I thought that I might've exposed it when I was loading the film, since it was the first frame, but the weird thing is that it's on the trailing edge of the picture. I dunno.

I kinda like how it turned out, though. Mistakes = art, right?