Bush funneling money to al-quaeda related sunni extremists

[plained]

how can you expect anybody to ever let anything go when you have this attitude

Putting eyedrops in some dickhead's water after he's insulted your family is just poetic justice.

really tho how can you expect others to do what you cant?

even the littlest thing like an isult demands actions like you state

?

[HM-PuFFNSTuFF]

stop trying to derail the thread shitstick

[Massive Quasars]

commit yourself, you dribbling retard

christ

[plained]

read

its relevent to the thread

[SoM]

bush is a fagot

lets see if he can catch me

[feedback]

If I catch you I'm gonna fuck you!

[SoM]

make sure to bring black pepper a magnifying glass and tweezers..

[plained]

wtf

[GONNAFISTYA]

Some sources say that 4 or 5 Generals may resign if an attack on Iran is instigated.

That's unheard of. Generals don't resign for reasons of conscience.

TBH...you seem to be on top of these things and I don't understand why you're surprised at this announcement...at least now. Mr.Hersh reported that very same statement about the resigning generals nearly 4 months ago....he's simply reiterating it.

As to the fact that the US appears to be simply trying to "split up" all Muslim countries into a multi-fronted attack upon ONE muslim sect in the ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST NOT JUST IRAQ is taking a page right from Sun Tzu....and will create civil war across the region.

Who knows? Maybe that was the plan all along.

[HM-PuFFNSTuFF]

So anyway, is there no outrage that Bush is covertly funneling money to Al Qaeda members?

What's the deal?

[GONNAFISTYA]

Business as usual.

Besides...doesn't everyone already know that Bush and Bin Laden (if he's still alive) have sucked each other's cock from the start?

[R00k]

Some sources say that 4 or 5 Generals may resign if an attack on Iran is instigated.

That's unheard of. Generals don't resign for reasons of conscience.

TBH...you seem to be on top of these things and I don't understand why you're surprised at this announcement...at least now. Mr.Hersh reported that very same statement about the resigning generals nearly 4 months ago....he's simply reiterating it.

As to the fact that the US appears to be simply trying to "split up" all Muslim countries into a multi-fronted attack upon ONE muslim sect in the ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST NOT JUST IRAQ is taking a page right from Sun Tzu....and will create civil war across the region.

Who knows? Maybe that was the plan all along.

I must have missed it when Hersh said something the last time.

I haven't had as much time lately to keep up with politics and news, but I still try to quickly browse the highlights every day just to keep up.

The generals thing was a surprise to me, but the real news was this covert funding of Sunni terrorists. I'm not shocked or even really surprised at it, TBH. It's another log on the bonfire they've made of the mideast the last several years.

What's really interesting about the article, is the inside information it contains, and the kind of behavior it shows in Washington.

This administration is so secretive, that it's always like a bucket of cold water in the face when I read insider accounts about the way they communicate, and the kind of conversations these guys actually have about world politics. It's frightening, to say the very least.

And this part was particularly chilling:

The Administration is now examining a wave of new intelligence on Iran’s weapons programs. Current and former American officials told me that the intelligence, which came from Israeli agents operating in Iran, includes a claim that Iran has developed a three-stage solid-fuelled intercontinental missile capable of delivering several small warheads—each with limited accuracy—inside Europe. The validity of this human intelligence is still being debated.

A similar argument about an imminent threat posed by weapons of mass destruction—and questions about the intelligence used to make that case—formed the prelude to the invasion of Iraq. Many in Congress have greeted the claims about Iran with wariness; in the Senate on February 14th, Hillary Clinton said, “We have all learned lessons from the conflict in Iraq, and we have to apply those lessons to any allegations that are being raised about Iran. Because, Mr. President, what we are hearing has too familiar a ring and we must be on guard that we never again make decisions on the basis of intelligence that turns out to be faulty.”

Still, the Pentagon is continuing intensive planning for a possible bombing attack on Iran, a process that began last year, at the direction of the President. In recent months, the former intelligence official told me, a special planning group has been established in the offices of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, charged with creating a contingency bombing plan for Iran that can be implemented, upon orders from the President, within twenty-four hours.

In the past month, I was told by an Air Force adviser on targeting and the Pentagon consultant on terrorism, the Iran planning group has been handed a new assignment: to identify targets in Iran that may be involved in supplying or aiding militants in Iraq. Previously, the focus had been on the destruction of Iran’s nuclear facilities and possible regime change.

Two carrier strike groups—the Eisenhower and the Stennis—are now in the Arabian Sea. One plan is for them to be relieved early in the spring, but there is worry within the military that they may be ordered to stay in the area after the new carriers arrive, according to several sources. (Among other concerns, war games have shown that the carriers could be vulnerable to swarming tactics involving large numbers of small boats, a technique that the Iranians have practiced in the past; carriers have limited maneuverability in the narrow Strait of Hormuz, off Iran’s southern coast.) The former senior intelligence official said that the current contingency plans allow for an attack order this spring. He added, however, that senior officers on the Joint Chiefs were counting on the White House’s not being “foolish enough to do this in the face of Iraq, and the problems it would give the Republicans in 2008.”

From Israeli-supplied intelligence, to shifting attack plans to attacking suspected "supply chains" to Iraq, to the President being able to order an attack on 24-hours notice.....

It's just fucking surreal. I wonder how many members of Congress might have known about this already and didn't say anything (loyal republicans), and I also wonder how many will even be concerned enough to challenge the administration on it.
I mean, if he is ordering a 24-hour ready group for attacks, I think it's pretty obvious he's thinking about taking the decision into his own hands. Not that that was ever really a question - but this is being pretty bold about it.

[plained]

how can you expect anybody to ever let anything go when you have this attitude

Putting eyedrops in some dickhead's water after he's insulted your family is just poetic justice.

peace starts in the heart ey

this type of attitude leads to this whole "war" situation and is very relevent to this thread.

[R00k]

And two things that are particularly terrifying:

1) The attack scenarios have been broadened to include hitting targets that may be "helping insurgents" in Iraq. What this means, is that Bush could try to attack Iran without any Congressional approval, and claim that it was still a part of the Iraq war -- because he is only retaliating to attacks committed against us there, and protecting our troops. Thus, he doesn't need Congressional approval to do so.

2) The Joint Chiefs actually think the White House is not "foolish enough" to attack Iran? Where in the hell did they get an idea like that? They are dangerously underestimating this administration's fervent ideology -- not only that, but they are counting on it to prevent an attack.

[plained]

how can you expect anybody to ever let anything go when you have this attitude

Putting eyedrops in some dickhead's water after he's insulted your family is just poetic justice.

peace starts in the heart ey

this type of attitude leads to this whole "war" situation and is very relevent to this thread.

a quick answer will be fine

you dont have to type a paragraph or nothin

[HM-PuFFNSTuFF]

hey plained if you really wanted an answer you'd post in the other thread. so how bout fucking off from trying to derail this one?
tia

[plained]

i answerd all the uestions in the other thread.

its just the aswers wernt liked.

this question i ask is very relevent to this thread.

rook has made hundreds of these types of threads, ive never had a problem with them.

now i have unaswerd questions regarding how he can expect others to be, do and feel different from him about the same subject.

[HM-PuFFNSTuFF]

you expect all people to feel the same?

[HM-PuFFNSTuFF]

clearly he wants people to give each other the shits rather than kill each other. I think that's a fair compromise.

[HM-PuFFNSTuFF]

now fuck off

[R00k]

:icon14:

[plained]

see its a comprehend what you read issue again.

its about an attitude, and expectaitions from others.


its about covert escalative retrobution .

how can one not expect it from others when they themselves arnt willing to execpt it from others?

i think its a pretty clear question and relevent as well.

[MKJ]

someone prune this thread plz

[R00k]

No, it's not relevant to this thread. This thread is about geopolitics.

Your post is about an ad hominem attack, trying to call me a hypocrite out of context.

Here's the news: That was a completely different thread. I have never actually put eyedrops into anyone's drink, and I have never pulled any kind of secret prank on someone for insulting my family.

That entire post was just to make a point -- on the subject of THAT thread.

This is a DIFFERENT thread. If you want to pull my post out of that thread, and then try to say that if I support pranks, then I should also support the slaughter of thousands of people for no good reason.....

.....then you just reaffirm my growing belief that you are an utter fucking idiot who could fall into a barrel of tits and still come out sucking his thumb.

Now GTFO and make your own thread, you shit-sucking little weasel. I already told you that I'd answer even the most senseless of your questions if you do - which was probably a mistake on my part, so take advantage.

[plained]

well i'm glad to see you went back on urself

i can see it mustuve upset you to do that from all the names you call me afterward.

still tho i dont derive any gratifacation from this. as anybody can read, my posts here for years where always fucking around haveing fun, never serios ofr flames or nothin.


but you made me take notice of you when you started refering to me in a derogatory way in threads i had never been in.

otherwise i'd'ave never noticed you .