zoophiles have a good ol chit chat

Post by **Captain** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:51 pm

In before Krapus.

Post by **R00k** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:23 pm

MKJ wrote:
Ryoki wrote:Allow me to say 'mule' here for a second. Or 'rep'.
surely rep isnt having sex with anyone
or anything

the insinuation is that rep is the byproduct of inter-species breeding. like a mule is.

keep up nerd

Post by **MKJ** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:35 pm

R00k wrote:
MKJ wrote:
Ryoki wrote:Allow me to say 'mule' here for a second. Or 'rep'.
surely rep isnt having sex with anyone
or anything
the insinuation is that rep is the byproduct of inter-species breeding. like a mule is.

keep up nerd

yes i got that, thanks :icon14:
i was taking it one step further and... oh fuckit :icon33:

Post by **dzjepp** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:56 pm

[xeno]Julios wrote:
Mogul wrote:
Foo wrote:Juls is right.

Also, lol, we fucking kill them and eat their flesh.....
lol you eat horse meat?

...or were you referring to those people...
i think foo's point was this:

some people argue that having sex with non human animals is wrong, because it can potentially interfere with the well being of the animal.

So, the argument is: bestiality is wrong because it harms the animal.

Foo pointed out that we fucking kill animals to eat them. So it's a bit hypocritical, since killing something is an ultimate form of harm.

Can't it also be hypocritical of loving a household pet and at the same time being a carnivore?

Post by **Scourge** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:08 am

dzjepp wrote:
[xeno]Julios wrote:
Mogul wrote: lol you eat horse meat?

...or were you referring to those people...
i think foo's point was this:

some people argue that having sex with non human animals is wrong, because it can potentially interfere with the well being of the animal.

So, the argument is: bestiality is wrong because it harms the animal.

Foo pointed out that we fucking kill animals to eat them. So it's a bit hypocritical, since killing something is an ultimate form of harm.
Can't it also be hypocritical of loving a household pet and at the same time being a carnivore?

If I get hungry enough Scruffy better hide.

edit: Btw, I'm down from 2 dogs and 3 cats to 2 cats 0 dogs.

Post by **Captain** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:21 am

My condolences

Post by **Scourge** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:32 am

The dogs were tasty. The cat, well, let's just say they tend to explode when penetrated. Duct tape doesn't help either.

Post by **Captain** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:34 am

Oh I thought they died of natural causes. Unless "death by crazed psychopath" is natural

Post by **Scourge** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:44 am

I'm organic. It's natural.

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:17 am

dzjepp wrote:
Can't it also be hypocritical of loving a household pet and at the same time being a carnivore?

yea i tend to think so. And I do both, so I do have cognitive dissonance about that.

Post by **Scourge** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:24 am

I think it's perfectly fine to eat what you fuck and fuck what you eat. Saves time gathering both separately.

Post by **Captain** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:23 am

"Mmm, honey, what's this tangy sauce in the veal?"
"Well remember when I said I had a boner?"

Post by JB » Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:28 am

there is no dissonance about loving animals and loving them with mint sauce. Just beacause you love your cat but also love eating Korean doesnt make you a hypocrite.

Its like saying "i love sheep but i love wearing wool"

I dont see any cognitive dissonance there